Quantcast
Channel: New Liturgical Movement
Viewing all 8583 articles
Browse latest View live

The Feast of St Benedict 2015

$
0
0
Gloriosus Confessor Domini, orationem faciens, benedictionem dedit; et lapis, super quem antiquus hostis sedebat, subito levatus est. (3rd antiphon of Vespers on the Solemnity of St Benedict.)

The episode referred to in the antiphon above, depicted in the sacristy of the church of San Miniato in Florence by Spinello Aretino, 1388.
The Lord’s glorious confessor, making his prayer, gave the blessing, and the stone, upon which teh ancient enemy sat, was at once lifted up.

In the Second Book of St Gregory the Great’s Dialogues, dedicated to the life and miracles of St Benedict, the episode is recounted thus in chapter nine:
On a certain day, when the monks were building up the cells of the same abbey, there lay a stone which they meant to employ about that business: and when two or three were not able to remove it, they called for more company, but all in vain, for it remained so immovable as though it had grown to the very earth.
They plainly perceived that the devil himself sat on it, seeing so may men's hands could not so much as once move it: wherefore, finding that their own labors could do nothing, they sent for the man of God, to help them with his prayers against the devil, who hindered the removing of that stone. The holy man came, and after some praying, he gave it his blessing, and then they carried it away so quickly, as though it had been of no weight at all.
St Benedict died on March 21 in the year 543 or 547, and this was the date on which his principal feast was traditionally kept, and is still kept by Benedictines; it is sometimes referred to on the liturgical calendars of Benedictine liturgical books as the “Transitus - Passing” There was also a second feast to honor the translation of his relics, which was kept on July 11. The location to which the relics were translated is still a matter of dispute, with the Abbey of Monte Cassino in Italy, founded by the Saint himself, and the French Abbey of Fleury, also known as Saint-Benoît-sur-Loire, both claiming to possess them. This second feast is found in many medieval missals and breviaries, even in places not served by monastic communities. (It was not, however, observed by either the Cistercians or Carthusians.). The second feast was in a certain sense the more solemn in the traditional use of the Benedictines; March 21 always falls in Lent, and the celebration of octaves in Lent was prohibited, but most monastic missals have the July 11 feast with an octave. In the post-Conciliar reform of the Calendar, many Saints, including St Benedict, were moved out of Lent; in his case, to the day of this second feast in the Benedictine Calendar.

Is the Youth of Today Necessarily “Modern Man”?

$
0
0
One of many choirs at this year's Colloquium
Recently my son and I participated in the Sacred Music Colloquium XXV of the Church Music Association of America, held at Dusquesne University in Pittsburgh. As with the Sacra Liturgia 2015 Conference, a large portion of the participants were young adults who love beautiful music that is obviously sacred in its stylistic qualities, cultural associations, and avowed liturgical purpose.

People from my generation (born in the 1970s) and younger know, without need for much explanation, that Gregorian chant, Renaissance polyphony, and post-Renaissance choral works of grand and intimate scale are the music of the Catholic liturgy.[1] Such music says “Catholic” the moment you hear it, which is why Hollywood always reaches for it when depicting anything Catholic. This vast repertoire, “a treasure of inestimable value, greater even than that of any other art” (Sacrosanctum Concilium 112) was written expressly for ecclesiastical ceremonies. At its best, it is not trying to compete with or emulate popular styles of music; it is not serving two masters; it is not a multi-purpose Swiss Army knife. It is church music, sacred music, pure and simple, and that is why it is so singularly effective and lovable. We admire what is pure and simple, because it fits its function to a T. It works. What isn’t broken doesn’t need to be fixed.

In connection with the Colloquium, I would like to develop an idea I’ve been thinking about ever since I read the following paragraph in the FIUV Position Paper n. 25, “The Extraordinary Form and Sub-Saharan Africa.”
This conflict between the traditional principles of African spirituality and Western cultural influence creates an unfamiliar context for many liturgical progressives, who have often explicitly seen their proposals as attempts to come to terms with the triumph of post-Enlightenment culture, a triumph which, in their view, can no longer be contested. However we might assess this project in the context of the developed world, the proposal to make concessions to Rationalism, for example, by excluding silence and complex ceremonial from the liturgy, or to make concessions to Romanticism, by promoting informality and spontaneity, take on very different appearance in the African context. There is a real danger of such tendencies assisting the neo-colonial attack on indigenous African spirituality.
This observation certainly seems like a persuasive argument in regard to Africa (or, for that matter, any non-Western society that has its own native religious traditions). But what intrigues me is the general claim that Rationalism and Romanticism — the two great counterforces of modernity, each an extreme reacting against the other — are the two slave-drivers behind the liturgical reform.[2]

Rationalism cracks the whip and shouts: “No silence! Everything must be SAID and UNDERSTOOD! No complexity! Stop all that intricate symbolic stuff! Stop all that lugubrious chanting! Modern man has no patience, no time, no ability, no need for it! It promotes an aristocracy of clerics! Let the light of objective reason shine!” But then Romanticism sneaks in, elbows an unsuspecting Rationalism aside, and, with a voice all the more poisonous for seeming friendly: “Relax! Go with the flow! You are too formal, uptight, rigid, and cerebral! Let go of the rubrics, find your inner child, feel it in your bones, be yourself! Everything’s about YOU, your feelings, your neediness — this is your moment!” Each struggles for supremacy; in a weird sort of way, they are codependent and collaborative. They stop at nothing to eviscerate the tradition that precedes them, until all that is left is a disembodied reason of empty structures and a derationalized self-indulgent sentimentalism.

Be that as it may, what we see at work in the liturgical reform is a peculiarly self-centered assumption that the preoccupations of modern Western man — rationalism and romanticism being characteristic -isms of an imbalanced worldview and an inadequate philosophy — are the preoccupations of all of humanity, including Africa and Asia and the poor of other countries, not to mention all generations. As a result, the new liturgy is going to be imposed on every nation, every people, every culture, and every generation, regardless of whether or not they meet the hyper-modern Eurocentric criteria on the basis of which it was designed. The absurdity of such an assumption is obvious, but it becomes even more obvious when one considers generational shifts.

It seems to me that just as there is a problem with assuming that African Catholics need the new Mass when the old Mass was and is, in fact, more suited to their culture, there is an analogous problem with assuming that today’s young Catholics, especially those who have been raised in a more traditional manner and homeschooled, automatically carry the same modernist or postmodernist burdens that the rest of Western society bears. Of course, we’re all moderns in a whole host of subtle and obvious ways, but since a good deal of the modern mentality is a flight from reality and a sort of self-invited neurosis, it seems distinctly possible — and my decades of experience as a student and then as an undergraduate and graduate-level teacher have confirmed this over and over — that young people today might actually be free of a lot of the existential baggage of their elders. The problems of the sixties and seventies are just not the same as our problems. And young faithful Catholics have not necessarily problematized their existence, or the concept of tradition, or the concept of authority, or the concept of the sacred and the mystical.

We are still struggling with the fallout of rationalism and romanticism, but we are not as naïvely optimistic about the power of human reason and of sincere feelings to lead us into an Edenic new world of human brotherhood. That strikes us as pretty vomitous, and we are looking for something a lot more serious, something real and realistic, which, paradoxically, we know will have to be something very different and, I would dare to say, transcendent. Otherwise it is fake; it is looking at a mirror and falling in love with our own image. We are looking for the original, the One from whom we come and to whom we are going.

At Sacra Liturgia 2015 and Colloquim XXV, one sees ample evidence that we are turning a corner. The rebels of yesteryear look embarrassingly old-fashioned, and the youth who still want to practice their Faith need more, desire more, and deserve more than the Church’s hierarchy has been willing (or even able?) to give them until now. And these young men and women are figuring out how to find their way back to the Tradition, in spite of all obstacles, detours, traps, and poor signage. This movement—this hunger for Catholic Tradition—cannot be stopped. But it can be somewhat delayed by obstructionists or actively promoted by shepherds who care for the eternal destiny of their sheep. I am reminded in this connection of a butler's speech from a P. G. Wodehouse novel:
It is my experience that opposition in matters of the ’eart is useless, feedin’, as it so to speak does, the flame. Young people, your lordship, if I may be pardoned for employing the expression in the present case, are naturally romantic and if you keep ’em away from a thing they sit and pity themselves and want it all the more. And in the end you may be sure they get it. There’s no way of stoppin’ them.[3]
Indeed: the traditional movement is not going away. Meanwhile, our shepherds stand to gain glory or shame, depending on how they react to this impetus of the Holy Spirit. Let us pray for them daily.


NOTES

[1] The CD Benedicta of the Monks of Norcia made it right to the top of the classical billboard, showing once again that the prayerful yearning for peace and transcendence expressed by Gregorian chant is not a passing fad but a constant need of our society. It would be helpful if prelates and pastors would pay attention to actual cultural trends like this one, instead of paying attention to what seemed to be trends several decades ago.

[2] The position paper states this explicitly elsewhere: “the Novus Ordo reflects the passage through European thinking of Rationalism and Romanticism.”

[3] P. G. Wodehouse, A Damsel in Distress, Collector's Wodehouse ed., p. 238.

The Feast of St Camillus de Lellis

$
0
0
Today is the anniversary of the death in 1614 of St Camillus de Lellis, and his feast day in the Calendar of the Ordinary Form. Born in the Abruzzi region of Italy, he served in youth as a soldier of the Venetian Republic against the Turks; he is honored as a Patron Saint of gambling addicts, since he himself suffered much from this vice, which once literally cost him the shirt off his back. Reduced by gambling to the most extreme poverty, he underwent a conversion experience which led him embrace religious life, and eventually, after priestly ordination, to found a congregation of Clerks Regular, the Ministers of the Sick. In addition to the ordinary vows, the Camillians, as they are sometimes called, also take a fourth vow to administer to the ill, even when they suffer from a contagious disease, and likewise, to attend the dying of whatever condition. The red cross now internationally recognized as a symbol of medical care originated from the large red cross which St Camillus’ sons and daughters wear on the front of their habit.

Pope Leo XIII declared him a Patron Saint of the sick, and along with St John of God, the founder of the Order of Brothers Hospitallers, added his name to the Litanies for the Dying. (In the Extraordinary Form, his feast is on July 18th, one of a series of Saints displaced from their respective death days by the feast of Pope Anacletus, now recognized to be the same person as Pope Cletus.)

Shortly after its founding, the order received as a gift a small church dedicated to St Mary Magdalene, very close to the Pantheon in the center of Rome. It was completely torn down, and over the course of the 17th century rebuilt as one of the most elaborate churches in the city, despite its small size; the relics of St Camillus, who was canonized in 1746, now rest in the side chapel of the right transept.

An effigy of St Camillus, with his bones underneath.
The side-altar of the right transept, in which his relics were formerly kept, and a bust-reliquary of him above.
The main altar
The fresco of the apse, showing Christ healing the sick.
In a side chapel at the back of the church on the right side is kept this Crucifix; as St Camillus was praying before it, the arms miraculously opened up and Christ spoke to him from it, to encourage him in the founding of the Order.
The side chapel on the opposite end contains an enormous number of relics, including several items of clothing worn by the Saint.
A side chapel on the right side of the nave houses this image of the Virgin Mary, honored with the title “Salus Infirmorum - Health of the Infirm.”
The organ and organ loft, mounted on the counter-façade, famously one of the most elaborately decorated organs in the city.  
St Mary Magdalene anoints the feet of Christ in the house of Simon the Pharisee, depicted in the ceiling of the crossing. 
A chasuble and stole laid out for the feast day, decorated with a medallion image of St Camillus, and the red cross of the Order. 
The ceiling of the sacristy; St Philip Neri, who knew St Camillus personally and acted as his confessor, welcomes him into heaven and the company of the Saints. 
The rococo façade, completed in the 18th century, one of only two construction in that style in the historical center of Rome. 

A First Mass in Slovenia

$
0
0
Our thanks to a reader who sent in some pictures from the facebook page of the parish church of St Peter in Radovljica, Slovenia, where newly ordained Fr Gašper Mauko recently celebrated his first Mass. It’s good to see not only that the Mass was said ad orientem, but also that people still turn out in force for such special occasion, many wearing the traditional costume of the region. Congratulations to Fr Mauko - ad multos annos!











St Vladimir the Great

$
0
0
Today marks the 1000th anniversary of the death of St Vladimir the Great, Grand Prince of Kiev, who is honored by the Byzantine churches as one of the most important figures in the Christianization of the Eastern Slavs. Along with his grandmother St Olga, he is given the liturgical title “Isapostolos – Equal to the Apostles”, in imitation of the titles of the Emperor Constantine and his mother St Helena.

St Olga, princess of Kiev, converted to Christianity and was baptized at Constantinople in 957, when she was close to 70 years old, during the reign of her son Sviatoslav. The traditional account is that she was the first person among the people then known as the Rus’ to be baptized. Her son did not convert, however; his death in 972 was followed by war between his three sons, at the end of which the youngest, Vladimir, whom he had begotten with his housekeeper, was left as the prince of Kiev. Although Vladimir’s path to the throne was certainly a bloody one, (much of the family history reads like the plot summaries of Game of Thrones), and despite his truly Solomonic appetite for women, it was he who ultimately brought about the first conversion of the East Slavs and the Baptism of Rus’.

A Russian icon of St Vladmir, and his sons, the Passion-Bearers Ss Boris and Gleb, who were later murdered by a third son, called Sviatoplok “the Accursed.” (ca. 1560.)
The ancient Slavic chronicles record a famous episode that, when investigating which religion he and his people ought to embrace, Vladimir judged Islam altogether undesirable because of the prohibition on drinking alcohol, saying “Drinking is the joy of all Rus’. We cannot exist without that pleasure.” The envoys sent by him to visit the temples of various neighboring peoples reported that the Bulgar Muslim “bows, sits down, looks hither and thither like one possessed, and there is no happiness among them, but instead only sorrow and a dreadful stench. Their religion is not good.” Their report of the Latin Rite among the Germans was that “we beheld no glory there.” But they described the Divine Liturgy celebrated on a great feast in Constantinople in these terms: “(T)he Greeks led us to the edifices where they worship their God, and we knew not whether we were in heaven or on earth. For on earth there is no such splendor or such beauty, and we are at a loss how to describe it. We know only that God dwells there among men, and their service is fairer than the ceremonies of other nations. For we cannot forget that beauty… If the Greek faith were evil, it would not have been adopted by your grandmother Olga, who was wiser than all other men.”

Shortly thereafter, Vladimir captured an important Greek city in the Crimea, and used his position to negotiate for the hand in marriage of the Emperor Basil II’s sister Anna, which would entail an alliance with Byzantium. At Basil’s insistence that his sister could not marry a pagan, Vladimir agreed to be baptized first; upon his triumphal return to Kiev he exhorted (and to some degree, it must be said, forced) the residents of the city to accept the new religion. A baptism en masse, the first of several, was held in the Dneiper river; this is now called “the Baptism of Kiev”, an episode whose 1000th anniversary was commemorated in 1988, just before the fall of the Berlin Wall. For the rest of his reign, more peaceable than the first part, Vladimir enthusiastically supported the evangelization of his people, and amended the irregularities of his earlier life.

The Baptism of Prince St Vladimir, by Victor Vasnetsov, 1890; made as preparatory image for a fresco in the Cathedral of St Vladimir in Kiev.
Let us take this occasion to pray for peace among the peoples converted by St Vladimir, especially for Ukraine, whose capital, Kiev, is the city where the Rus’ embraced the Christian faith.

The troparion of his feast: Holy Prince Vladimir, you were like a merchant in search of fine pearls. By sending servants to Constantinople for the orthodox Faith, you found Christ, the priceless pearl. He appointed you to be another Paul, washing away in baptism your physical and spiritual blindness. We celebrate your memory, asking you to pray for all orthodox Christians and for us, your spiritual children.


The kontakion: Most glorious Vladimir, in your old age you imitated the great apostle Paul: he abandoned childish things, while you forsook the idolatry of your youth. Together with him you reached the fullness of divine wisdom: You were adorned with the purity of holy baptism. Now as you stand before Christ our Savior, pray that all orthodox Christians may be saved.

A New Polyphonic Mass for the Feast of Our Lady of Mount Carmel

$
0
0
The FSSP church in Littleton, Colorado, dedicated to Our Lady of Mount Carmel, will celebrate its patronal feast this evening with a polyphonic Mass newly composed for the occasion. The composer, Mr J Lee Graham, has worked together with the church’s music director, Mr Rick Wheeler, to provide not just a Kyriale, but a complete set of Mass propers as well, in alternating chant and polyphony, the two sets of pieces being conceived and written as a unit, and sharing various themes. The website Denver Catholic reports on the project, and includes three really excellent samples from the Mass, which you can listen to by clicking here.
In their own expression of love for Mary and gratitude for their church, the choir at Our Lady of Mount Carmel Latin Rite Parish will perform a one-of-a-kind sound during a solemn traditional Mass July 16. Using Medieval chants and polyphony... the parish will honor its patron Our Lady of Mount Carmel. Rick Wheeler, music director for the parish, said he doesn’t think there’s another Mass with music like it. “As far as we know, no other (polyphonic Mass) in history begins in the way ours does,” he said. He worked with fellow composer and friend Lee Graham to create a music score for the 7 p.m. feast day Mass at the Littleton parish that celebrates the Tridentine Mass. ... The music for the Mass will imitate that of France, Spain and Italy around the 1500s and is inspired by the work of Tomás Luis de Victoria, a famous 16th-century composer in Spain. “We took many examples of polyphonic Masses of the 1500s and 1600s and noticed one specific characteristic that stuck out to us: an alternation of chant and polyphony,” Wheeler said. “Both of us quickly came to the conclusion that the Mass had to be like that very historical style.” The music score for the Mass fluctuates between the Gregorian chants written specifically for the Mass and polyphony written by Graham, sung in Latin—and some Greek—by a choir of more than a dozen men and women, Wheeler said.
The church is located at 5612 South Hickory Circle in Littleton, Colorado; the Mass begins at 7 p.m.

Image from the parish website

Liturgical Colors and Vesting Prayers: A Radio Talk by Fr Eric Andersen

$
0
0
The website of Mater Dei radio, based in Portland Oregon, has made available another interview with Fr Eric Ansdersen, a priest of the diocese of Portland, this time talking about (inter alia) the liturgical colors, the use and symbolic meaning of the vestments, and clerical dress. Click here to listen.

From the Fota Conference: Presentation of Last Year’s Proceedings

$
0
0
As a final note from the Eighth Fota Liturgical Conference recently concluded in Cork, Ireland, the proceedings of last year’s conference, were launched by His Eminence Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke. In his response to Cardinal Burke’s comments, the editor, Dr. Mariusz Bilineiwicz, provided a detailed outline of the volume’s contents and a summary of the various papers presented at last year’s gathering. The volume, entitled Agere in Persona Christi: Aspects of the Ministerial Priesthood, is published by Smenos Publications and may be obtained at discount through their webpage www.smenospublications.com.


Cardinal Burke’s address

With great pleasure, I preside at the presentation of the Proceedings of the Seventh Fota International Liturgy Conference, held in July of 2014. The title of the Proceedings is Agere in persona Christi: Aspects of the Ministerial Priesthood. The Polish theologian Mariusz Bliniewicz, a faithful participant in the Fota International Liturgy Conference who has presented at the Conference in the past, edited the volume for Smenos Publications. With the imminent publication of the Proceedings of the Sixth Fota International Liturgy Conference, held in July of 2013, all of proceedings of what has become a recognized annual meeting of cultores of the Sacred Liturgy, the highest and most perfect expression of our life in Christ, will be available to the public.

We are all in debt to the Saint Colman’s Society for Catholic Liturgy, especially its good secretary Terry Pender, for the organization of the Conference, to Monsignor James O’Brien who, with a certain genius, develops the program of the Conference each year, and to the Knights of Columbus and other benefactors who help make possible the Conference itself and the publication of the Proceedings. I now invite Mariusz Bliniewicz, the editor of Volume VII of the Proceedings, to give a brief formal presentation of the volume.


Dr Bliniewicz’s address

I would like to start this very short presentation from expressing my gratitude to the organizers for inviting me to this year’s conference which, as always, turns out to be a very fruitful and enjoyable academic and liturgical enterprise. I always come to Cork with great pleasure and also with great pleasure I accepted the invitation to edit last year’s papers, which stand today before us in the form of this handsome volume. I think all of us will agree how fortunate it is to be able to have the proceedings of the conference available one year after the conference itself, not two years, as it has been initially.

It is also very fortunate that the leitmotif of this collection (ordained, ministerial priesthood) corresponds very well with the topic of this year’s conference (royal, baptismal priesthood of the faithful). When I first heard about the topic of Fota VII I thought that it would be very desirable and useful to include a reflection about the relationship between the ordained, ministerial priesthood and the royal, baptismal priesthood shared by all the faithful. Obviously the organizers of the Fota Conferences had the same impression and decided, very fortunately, as I said, to follow up on this topic and devote the whole conference this year to the topic of the royal priesthood of all members of the Church.

In my Foreword to the volume of Fota VII I refer to an opinion which was recalled by Fr James Moroney at the Fota Conference IV in 2011, that perhaps the most imperative theological issue at the turn of the twentieth and twenty first centuries will be the topic of ordained priesthood. I would add that one of the most relevant issues within this wide topic is the relationship between the ministerial priesthood and the royal priesthood. The Second Vatican Council left us with a succinct, laconic statement that these two dimension of Christ’s priesthood ‘differ not only in degree, but also in essence’ (LG 10) and decided not to elaborate on it further. Proceedings from the last year’s and this year’s conference will certainly constitute a great tool in pursuing further theological reflection upon this relationship, which is not a purely academic matter, but which touches deeply our everyday, Christian existence, especially our parish lives and the way the contemporary Catholic parishes function and operate. This is especially important in countries such as Ireland, where a restructuring of the parish life is taking place and takes different forms such as agglomerating parishes together, moving many of the parish tasks and responsibilities into the hands of lay people, or ordaining married men as permanent deacons. All this requires a renewed reflection on the identity and essential role of the ministerial and royal priesthood, first of all on academic level, but also on the practical level. Thus, the volume with which we are presented (Fota VII) now should be, in my opinion, read together with the next year’s volume (Fota VIII), which will gather this year’s contributions.

The papers gathered in the volume ‘In Persona Christi Agere– Aspects of the Ministerial Priesthood’ were organized in a systematic manner, according to a well known theological method. Since the Bible is the ‘soul of theology’ (DV 24), it begins with scriptural reflection of Fr. Dieter Bohler on the notion the service of the Levis in the Temple and its relation to the mission of the Messiah in the work of St. Luke, the Evangelist. Then, the theology of the Fathers of the Church comes into the conversation with Fr. Stefan Heid’s presentation of the notion of the altar as the centre of prayer and priesthood in the early Christianity. Next, a systematic reflection upon the various aspects of the ministry of the ordained priesthood is carried out. Fr. Joao Paolo de M. Dantas takes a close look at the concept of the priest acting not only ‘in persona Christi’, but also ‘in persona Christi Capitis’ (in the person of Christ, the Head), while Fr. Sven Conrad, FSSP, examines the relationship between the celebrating priest and the sacrificial action of the Mass, in which he presents the hitherto developments and points to areas where further reflection is needed.

Card. Raymond Leo Burke’s paper on Card. Pietro Gasparri’s theological and canonical contribution to the topic of the role and the identity of the ordained priesthood introduces the reader to more contemporary authors and topics. Bishop Philip Boyce’s paper looks at the priesthood and its intercessory role through the eyes of Bl. John Henry Cardinal Newman, Fr. Thomas McGovern analyzes the topic of priesthood in the teaching of. St. Pope John Paul II and Christian Schaller examines the theology of priesthood in Joseph Ratzinger’s episcopal homilies. Fr. Manfred Hauke provides the reader with a systematic reflection upon the ministerial action of the priest acting in persona Christi Capitis in the context of sacramental diaconate and informs the reader about the recent theological discussions regarding this topic. The volume concludes with an outlook to the future – Andrea Bellandi’s examination of Joseph Ratzinger’s vision of the role of a priest in the third millennium gives the reader a grasp of the vision of our Pope Emeritus regarding the ministerial priesthood in the years to come.

Thus, as can be seen, the volume offers the prospective reader a number of different angles from which they can look at the question of ordained priesthood: biblical, patristic, systematic, canonical, historical, practical and pastoral. Naturally, the volume does not aspire to be an exhaustive treatment of the topic of priesthood, but rather to be a useful contribution to other existing sources, both magisterial and academic. It is the hope of the editor that the proceedings of the Seventh Fota International Liturgical Conference, which now perhaps could and should change its name to Fota International Liturgical and Theological Conference, will turn out to be a useful tool for further investigations on the matter of the ministry of ordained priesthood, which our present Pontiff, Pope Francis, called once ‘a sign of the presence and action of the Risen Lord’ and a ‘building element of the community of brotherly love’.  

Good News and Bad from the Dominican Order

$
0
0
By an interesting coincidence, two items about the Dominican order popped up on facebook today. The bad-news item comes from Sandro Magister, who reports that for lack of vocations, the central Italian province of the Dominicans is apparently on the verge of closing one of its most important houses, San Marco in Florence. This follows the decision last year by the southern Italian province to close the equally important Neapolitan house at San Domenico Maggiore, once the home of St Thomas Aquinas.

The church of the Order’s first Florentine house, Santa Maria Novella, was given to them in 1221, the same year that St Dominic died, and rebuilt, along with the large convent next to it, from the mid-13th to mid-14th centuries. By the middle of the 15th century, when much of Italy was still slowly recovering from the Black Death, Florence, (which had missed the worst of the plague,) was flourishing to such a degree, and the Order along with it, that a second Dominican house was needed. (Few Italian cities have two major houses of the same religious order.) A Benedictine monastery only a kilometer from Santa Maria Novella was suppressed and given to them in 1443, to be populated by men from the convent in nearby Fiesole; among them was the painter Blessed Fra Angelico. Cosimo de’ Medici then undertook a massive renovation of the complex; among the famous cells painted by Angelico and his students is a slightly larger one where Cosimo would go on retreat.

The Annunciation, by Fra Angelico, 1443. This painting is seen at the top of the stairs as one enter the area of the friars’ cells from the Museum. 
It has to be said that the church of San Marco as we have it today is unimpressive, the result of Florence’s over-enthusiastic embrace of the Counter-Reformation. It houses the relics of one of the greatest Saints of both Florence and the Dominican Order, Antoninus, also a founder of the house, and later archbishop; Cosimo de’ Medici used to say that the safety of Florence depended entirely on his prayers. The conventual buildings next door to the church, which have been property of the Italian state since 1866, now house the National Museum of San Marco, which includes among other things several more paintings by Fra Angelico, and a magnificent Last Supper by Domenico Ghirlandaio, the teacher of Michelangelo.

The good-news item comes from First Things, which has a brief piece by Dominic Bouck, a member of the Province of St Joseph in the eastern United States, noting the surge in vocations in the Order in America. “After the ordination of eight of our brothers, there are over fifty of us studying for the priesthood or preparing to live life as a consecrated brother, about to be joined by fifteen more on July 25.” Not so long ago, the New York Times ran a piece to similar effect about the Dominicans in Ireland. Perhaps we can hope that in the not-too-distant future, the American and Irish superiors of the Dominicans will be able to spare some men to keep open some of the Order’s great historical houses on the continent.

A First Mass in Fort Wayne, Indiana

$
0
0
Our thanks and congratulations to Fr Royce Gregerson of the diocese of Fort Wayne - South Bend, Indiana, for sending in these photos from the Solemn High Mass which he celebrated on Corpus Christi, the day after his priestly ordination. The Mass was held at St Peter’s Church in Fort Wayne, and followed by a Eucharistic Procession. The vestments were produced from 2014–2015 by Arte Sacra Benedictus, a small artisanal vestment maker in Toledo, Spain, designed according to Fr Gregerson’s indications and modeled on an antique French set of vestments from the late 19th/early 20th century. (Note the large collar on the dalmatic and tunicle, a classically Spanish embellishment.) The choir was composed of students from the University of Notre Dame, directed by Ms. Mary Catherine Levri, Assistant Director of the Liturgical Choir and Assistant Organist, Basilica of the Sacred Heart, Notre Dame. All photos by Anastassia; I here give just a small selection from the large album on googlephotos. Click here to see the rest.















A Relic of St Camillus de Lellis

$
0
0
After seeing our post about St Camillus de Lellis, the founder of the congregation of Clerks Regular known as the Ministers of the Sick, on his OF feast day (July 14), a reader sent in this photograph of a relic of the Saint which he recently acquired. (Today is his EF feast day.) It is the form letter by which St Camillus, as the head of the order, grants to a member of the Congregation full rights to participate in all of its pious activities and exercises. The recipient was named Marcantonio Croce; St Camillus granted the same privileges to the man’s brother, Francesco Croce, as well, by adding his name on in the fifth line of the form letter, (the words represented below in italics.) Technically, there are a few words within the document which, with the addition of the brother, should have been changed to the plural; there is also a typo in the last sentence, in which the word “meritorium” should be “meritorum.” St Camillus’ signature and seal are on the bottom. A full translation is given below; click the image to enlarge the picture.

Camillus de Lellis, general prefect of the Order of the Ministers of the Infirm, to the most illustrious sir Marcantonio Croce, greetings (salutem) in Him who is the true salvation (salus).

That which your perpetual will to persevere in our Order and your outstanding merits require, that with every sort of duty we should declare the charity and regard which we owe you in the Lord: since we can show this in no other matter than in spiritual services, inasmuch as our frailty can endure: in accordance with that authority which God has granted to us in this Congregation of ours; we make you and your brother the most illustrious sir Francesco Croce, your brother, a participant in all of the pious works, prayers, Holy Sacrifices, fasts, confessions, ministrations to the sick, visits to hospitals and prisons, (acts of) assistance to the dying, and finally of all pious exercises whatsoever, both of body and soul, which through the grace of God, take place in the whole of this Congregation, and grant to you a full share in these things, with full and sincere affection in our heart, in Christ Jesus. In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Furthermore, we beseech God and the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, that from the inexhaustible treasure of the merits of the same His most beloved Son, fulfilling that which lacks in us, may enrich you with the blessing of every grace in this life, and finally reward you with the crown of eternal glory. Given at Milan on the seventh day of the month of July, in the year of the Lord 1610. Camillus de Lellis.

(From the absence of further honorifics, it would seem that the Croce brothers were not members of the clergy. The word “dominus - sir” was commonly used in these types of documents for all sorts of people, and does not imply that they were members of the nobility either.)

St. Thomas Aquinas’s Early Commentary on the Mass

$
0
0
St. Thomas Aquinas discusses at some length the place, time, location, words, and ceremonies of the Mass and their fittingness in the Summa theologiae, Tertia Pars, question 83. This text is, of course, magnificent and mature, characteristic of the final years of the saint’s life and theological labors, and is highly recommended reading for all Catholics who are serious about living the vita liturgica. You will certainly learn things from this question that you never knew before, even if you already consume a steady diet of books or blogs on liturgy.

Less well known, however, is an exposition of the Mass that Thomas as a young friar and prospective university teacher gave his Parisian audience at the end of Distinction 8 of Book IV of his Commentary on the Sentences of Peter Lombard. Here follows this fine text of the Angelic Doctor, in its first complete translation in English, thanks to Dr. Beth Mortensen of The Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine. As part of its long-term Opera Omnia project, of which 17 volumes are currently in print and 9 more are in the works (see here for an update), the Aquinas Institute is in the midst of a three-year NEH project to publish a bilingual annotated translation of Book IV of Aquinas's Commentary on the Sentences. Paragraph numbers have been added for the reader’s convenience.

St. Thomas Aquinas, In IV Sent., Distinction 8, expositio textus

[1] By all the rest of the things that are said, praise is given to God. It should be known that of those things that are said in the office of the Mass, some are said by the priest, some by the ministers, and some by the whole choir. Those indeed by which the people is directly ordered to God are only the ones said by the priests, who are the mediators between the people and God. And some of the priest’s words are said publically, regarding the whole people, in the person of whom he alone speaks them to God, like prayers and thanksgiving. But some are said privately, which regard only his own office, like consecrations and prayers of the sort that he does for the people, but not praying in the person of the people.

[2] Nevertheless when he is praying in the person of the people he also prefaces all his words with, The Lord be with you, so that the minds of the people may be united with him by a right intention. And since the people have the priest as their leader in that which is directed to God, for this reason at the end of every prayer the people consent by answering Amen; and this is also why every prayer of the priest ends aloud, even if it is done privately.

[3] Now for those things that are divinely handed down through the minister to others, the people are directed by the ministers of the altar. But those things that pertain to disposing the people, the choir accomplishes: of these, the ones that pertain to those things that surpass human reason, are started by the priest, as though divinely received; the ones that are consonant with reason are declared by the choir by itself. Likewise some pertain to the people as preparatory to receiving divine things; and these are said by the choir before those that are said by the ministers and priest. But some things are caused by the reception of divine things in the people, and these follow what the priest says.

[4] Therefore, having seen these things, it should be known that since all our activity is begun by God, it should likewise end in him, coming full circle. And this is why the office of the Mass begins from a prayer and ends in thanksgiving. Hence it has three principal parts: namely, the beginning of the prayer that lasts until the epistle [Part I]; the middle celebration itself that lasts until the postcommunion [Part II]; and the end of thanksgiving from there until the end [Part III].

Part I

[5] The first part contains two things, namely, the preparation of the people for prayer, and the prayer itself.

[6] Now the people are prepared for prayer in three ways. The first is by devotion, which is aroused in the Introit; hence it is also received by something pertaining to the solemnity, in the devotion of which the people are brought together, and the psalm is also added. Second, humility, which is done by the Kyrie eleison, for the one seeking mercy declares his wretchedness; and it is said nine times because of the nine choirs of angels, or because of faith in the Trinity, according as any Person is considered in himself and in relation to the other two. Third, by right intention, which is directed to the heavenly fatherland and glory, which exceeds all human reason; and this is done by the Glory to God in the highest, which the choir completes once the priest has started it. And so it is only said on solemnities which represent to us heavenly solemnity; but in the offices of grief it is completely omitted.

[7] Next comes the prayer poured out to God for the people, which the priest publically pronounces after The Lord be with you; it is taken from Ruth 2:4. However, the high priest says: Peace be with you, bearing the type of Christ who addressed his disciples with these words after the resurrection, in John 20:19 and 21.

Part II

[8] But the second main part contains three parts. The first is the instruction of the people until the offertory; the second, the offering of the matter until the Preface; the third, the consummation of the sacrament until the postcommunion.

Part II-1

[9] The instruction of the people is done through the word of God, which indeed reaches the people from God through his ministers; and so those things that pertain to the instruction of the people are not said by the priest, but by the ministers.

[10] There are three kinds of ministry of the word of God. The first is from authority, which belongs to Christ who is called ‘minister’ in Romans 15:8, of whom it is said, but he was teaching as one having power (Matt 7:29). The second is from the truth made plain which applies to the preachers of the New Testament, of whom it says, he has made us also worthy ministers, etc. (2 Cor 3:6). The third is from prefiguration, which applies to the preachers of the Old Testament, and this is why the deacon sets down Christ’s teaching. And since Christ is not only man, but God, for this reason the deacon says first, The Lord be with you, so that he might make men attentive to Christ as God. Now the teaching of the preachers of the New Testament is set down by subdeacons. Nor is it inconsistent that sometimes in place of an epistle something is read by them from the Old Testament, since the preachers of the New Testament also preached the Old. But the teaching of the preachers of the Old Testament is not always read by lower ministers, but for those days in which the configuration of the New and Old Testaments is especially indicated, like in the four fasting times of the year, and when certain things are celebrated that were prefigured in the Old Law, like the Passion, Christmas, the Baptism, and things like that. And since either teaching is directed to Christ, both of those who went before, and of those who came after, this is why the teaching of Christ is reserved for the end.

[11] However, from the teaching that is directed to Christ, two effects come forth for the people, by which also man is prepared for Christ’s teaching: namely, the progress of the virtues, which is suggested by the Gradual, for it is named from the step by which one ascends from one virtue to another, or from the steps of the altar before which it is said; and the exultation possessed from the hope of eternal things, which the Alleluia suggests; hence it is also repeated because of the stole of the soul and body. But on days and in offices of grieving it is omitted, and a Tract is put in its place, which by the harshness of voices and verbiosity of words suggests our residence in this present misery. However, during Eastertide, two alleluias are said because of the joy of the resurrection of head and of the members. But the effect of Gospel teaching is the confession of faith, which, since it is above reason, the Creed is begun by the priest and completed by the choir, nor is it said except for on those solemnities about which mention is made in the Creed, like the Nativity, the Resurrection, the apostles, who stood out as founders of the faith, as it says: like a skilled architect I have laid the foundation (1 Cor 3:10).

Part II-2

[12] Next comes the second part of the second main part, which pertains to the offering of the matter to be consecrated; and this contains three things. For the exultation of the ones offering it is stated first as preparatory to the offering, for God loves a cheerful giver (2 Cor 9:7). The offering itself is expressed when it is said, Receive, O Holy Trinity; the acceptance of the offering is said by prayers silently spoken, for it belongs to the priest alone to appease God by these offerings, for which prayer the priest prepares himself through humiliation, saying: humbled in spirit and contrite of heart may we find favor with you, O Lord. And since these three things named require that the mind be raised to God, this is why before all three is said, The Lord be with you (but in place of which is said Pray brethren when the prayer is to be said silently).

Part II-3

[13] The third part of the second main part, which pertains to the sacrament’s reception, contains three things. First, preparation; second, the sacrament’s completion, at: Therefore we humbly pray and beseech you, most merciful Father, etc.; third, the consuming of the sacrament, at: Let us pray. At the Savior’s command and formed by divine institution, we dare to say.

[14] However, the preparation of the people, ministers, and priest for such a great sacrament is done by devout praise of God; therefore in the Preface, in which the preparation mentioned happens, three things are contained. First, the people’s arousal to praise, where the priest, having said The Lord be with you, which is to be referred to this entire third part, invites them to raise their minds, saying: Lift up your hearts, and to thanksgiving, saying: Let us give thanks to the Lord our God. Second, he implores God to receive our praise, showing that praise is due, saying: Truly it is worthy, by reason of his dominion (hence he adds, Holy Lord), and just, because of his fatherhood (hence he adds: all-powerful Father); right, because of his deity (hence he adds, eternal God); and for our salvation, because of our redemption (hence he adds: through Christ our Lord). But sometimes some other matter of praise is added suited to the solemnity, e.g., and to praise you in the assumption of Blessed Mary, ever Virgin; also setting forth an example of praise, through whom the angels praise your majesty. Third, the people offer up praises of the divinity, taking up the words of the angels: Holy, holy, holy, Lord God of hosts (Isa 6:3); and of Christ’s humanity, taking up the words of the children: Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord (Matt 21:9).

[15] However, the part that contains the sacrament’s completion is divided in three, according to the three things that are integral to this sacrament: namely, what is the sacrament alone; what is the reality-and-sacrament; and what is the reality alone. In the first part, therefore, is contained the blessing of the matter offered, which is the sacrament alone; in the second part, the consecration of the body and blood of Christ, which is the reality-and-sacrament, at: bless and approve this our offering; in the third, the request of the sacrament’s effect, which is the reality alone, at: vouchsafe to look upon them with a gracious and tranquil countenance.

[16] Concerning the first, the priest does two things: first, he asks a blessing on the offering, which is called a gift from God having given it to us, a present as something offered to God by us, a sacrifice as something sanctified by God for our salvation. Second, he asks salvation for the ones offering it, or for whom it is offered, at: which we offer up to you in the first place, etc.

[17] There he does three things. First he commemorates those for whose benefit the victim is offered: for the general state of the Church, as well as for particular persons, at: Remember your servants. Second, he commemorates those in whose reverence it is offered, at: in union with the whole church, and the Virgin who offered Christ in the temple is included, the apostles who handed down this rite of offering to us, and the martyrs who offered themselves to God, but not confessors, because in ancient times the Church did not invoke them in solemnizing, or because they did not suffer like Christ, of whose Passion this sacrament is the memorial. Third, what is sought to be obtained by the offering of this victim is expressly concluded, at: accept this offering, etc.

[18] Deign to make this our offering blessed, approved, etc. This part belongs to the consecration, which contains three things: first, the power of consecrating is implored; second, the consecration is completed, at: who the day before he suffered, took the bread; third, the commemoration of the thing consecrated is explained, at: wherefore, calling to mind the blessed Passion, etc.

[19] However, the words that are said here: make this our offering blessed, approved, ratified, reasonable, acceptable, can be referred in one way to what is the reality contained in this sacrament, namely, Christ, who is the blessed victim free from any stain of sin; approved, i.e. prefigured by the figures of the Old Testament, and by divine predestination foreordained; ratified, because not transitory; reasonable, because of its suitability for appeasing; acceptable, because of its efficacy. In another way, it can be referred to the host itself, which is the sacrament only; which he asks it to be blessed, that God consecrate it; but that he confirm it as regards memory, approved, [and] as regards a fixed purpose, ratified, that he may accept it; reasonable, as regards the judgment of reason; acceptable, as regards something pleasing to the will. In a third way, it can be referred to the effect, hence he says, blessed, by which we are blessed; approved, by which we may be enrolled in heaven; ratified, by which we may be counted among Christ’s members; reasonable, by which we may be torn from all beastly sensuality; acceptable, by which we may be accepted by God.

[20] Vouchsafe to look upon them with a gracious and tranquil countenance. Here the priest asks for the effect of the sacrament; and first the effect of grace; second, the effect of glory, at: remember also your servants, Lord. Concerning the first he does two things: first he asks that the sacrament be received, which is the cause of grace; second, he asks that the gift of grace be given, at: we humbly pray and beseech you, the exposition of which will be given further on, at Distinction 13. However he first asks the effect of glory for those already dead, at: remember; second, for those still living, at: for us, though sinners.

[21] However, the Canon of the Mass is customarily completed by other prayers in Christ, at: through Christ our Lord, by whom this sacrament has its origin and as to its substance; hence he says, you create, because of the natural being; you sanctify, because of the sacrament’s being, and as to its power; hence he says, you give life, because of the effect of grace, which is the life of the soul; you bless, because of the increase of grace, and as to its operation, or use, hence he says: and bestow on us.

[22] Let us pray. At the Savior’s command and formed by divine institution, we dare to say. Here the reception of the sacrament is set down, before which is the general and specific preparation. The general preparation has three parts: for, first, the sacrament’s petition is set down in the Lord’s Prayer, in which is said, give us this day our daily bread; second, the expiation of those receiving through the prayer of the priest: deliver us, Lord, from all evil; third, the fulfillment of peace, at, The peace of the Lord be with you. For this is the sacrament of holiness and peace; and since the peace of Christ exceeds all the senses, for this reason the petition of peace is begun by the priest, when he says, The peace of the Lord be with you, and it is completed by the choir, when it says, Lamb of God. And in this way it finishes three things begun by the priest, namely, Glory to God in the highest, which pertains to hope; I believe in one God, which pertains to faith; and The peace of the Lord be with you, which pertains to charity.

[23] Now the people asks mercy in the removal of evil against the wretchedness of fault and punishment, and peace, in the accomplishment of all good; and for this the Lamb of God is said three times. However, the special preparation of the priest consuming happens throught he prayers he says privately: Lord, Jesus Christ, and whatever others there are.

Part III

[24] The third main part is the thanksgiving; and it contains two things: the calling to mind of the benefit received, in singing the antiphon after communion, and thanksgiving in prayer, which the priest carries out, so that the end of the Mass might correspond in likeness to the beginning.

[25] However, it should be known that in the office of the Mass where the Passion is represented, certain Greek words are contained, like kyrie eleison, i.e., Lord have mercy; and certain Hebrew words, like alleluia, i.e., praise God; Sabaoth, i.e. of hosts; hosanna, save I beg; amen, i.e. truly, or so be it: and certain Latin ones, which are evident. For the placard over the Cross of Christ was written in these three languages (Jn 19:20).

An Icon of the Prophet Elijah

$
0
0
In the liturgical Calendar of the Byzantine Rite, and in the two Carmelite Orders, July 20th is the feast of the Prophet Elijah. The Eastern tradition keeps almost all of the Prophets as Saints, and honors them as such in the liturgy. Veneration of Saints of the Old Testament is hardly known to the West, however, and where it is observed in the Latin rites, it arose under Eastern influence. The Carmelites, who came into existence as an Order in the Holy Land, honor Elijah as their founder, and keep his day as one of their patronal feasts, along with that of his disciple Elisha, on June 14th.

A facebook page which I check daily, Byzantinegallery, posted a photo today of this extraordinary icon of the Ascension of the Prophet Elijah, from the website of the Byzantine and Christian Museum in Athens.


Written by Theodore Poulakis in the second half of the 17th century, this icon comes from a church dedicated to St Elijah in Ano Korakiana on the island of Corfu; it was badly damaged after being stolen from the church and cut into pieces, but remains an impressive piece of work, and an interesting example of Western artistic influence on Byzantine sacred art. The central band is based on an engraving by Flemish artist Jan Wierix (see below); according to the Museum’s website, Flemish engravings were widely used as inspirations for icons in the Ionian islands from the 17th century on. It shows the Ascension of Elijah, with Elisha below his chariot receiving his mantle; on the left, Elisha shows the mantle to the “sons of the prophets” who had accompanied them to the Jordan, but not crossed over with them. (4 Kings 2)

The engraving by Jan Wierix, from the website of the British Museum
In the lower right of the central band, the patron who commissioned the work, a priest and monk named Sophronios Faskomelosis, identified by the inscription in front of him, kneels in prayer; on the opposite side is the city of Jerusalem. In the other bands are shown other episodes from the life of Elijah; at the upper left are three episodes from 3 Kings 17, where he first appears in the Bible, conversing with the widow at Sarephta, receiving food from a raven, and raising the widow’s son from the dead. In the lower band, the prophet defeats and slaughters the prophets of the idol Baal (chapter 18), and destroys the soldiers of the wicked King Ahab sent to apprehend him. All of the episodes depicted in this icon are traditionally read at Vespers of the Prophet Elijah in the Byzantine Rite. The artist’s signature is given at the lower left.

From Vespers of the Prophet Elijah: The one hallowed before his conception, the Angel embodied, the mind of fire, the man of heaven, the godlike forerunner of the second coming of Christ. the glorious Elias, the foundation of the Prophets has spiritually invited all lovers of festivals to celebrate his godly memory. At his intercessions guard your people, O Christ God, untroubled from every kind of harm of the trickster.

Sacred Music Workshop

$
0
0
There will be a Summer Sacred Music Workshop in Georgia, to be be held at Our Lady of the Mountains Roman Catholic Church in Jasper, GA, on August 15, 2015.
This one-day workshop is open to anyone who is interested Sacred Music. This is an opportunity for musicians in the Southeast area (Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, South Carolina and North Carolina) to learn about the Ancient Gregorian Chant and Classical Polyphony. Fr. David Carter, JCL, will be giving the keynote entitled, Re-discovery of the Church’s Sacred Tradition: II Kings 22. The deadline to register for the workshop is August 1.

Click here for more information

St John XXIII on St Lawrence of Brindisi

$
0
0
Today is the feast of St Lawrence of Brindisi, who was born on the feast of St Mary Magdalene in 1559, and died on the same day at the age of sixty in 1619. Although his family was Venetian, he was born in the major port city of Brindisi, then in the Kingdom of Naples, far down Italy’s Adriatic coast. After entering the Capuchins at the age of 16, he studied at the University of Padua, then the major university of the Venetian Republic, and showed a remarkable facility for languages, learning several modern ones in addition to the languages of the Bible. He was instrumental in establishing the Capuchin Order, then still a fairly new branch of the Franciscans, in Germany as a bulwark against the further spread of Protestantism, but also in rallying the German princes against the Ottoman Turks. He was chaplain to the army, which he helped to organize, stirred to attack with a rousing address, and led in battle armed only with a crucifix in his hand.

Despite these and many other activities, including a period as the head of his Order, and despite the extreme austerity of Capuchin life and the full round of liturgical and devotional prayer, St Lawrence also found time to write hundreds of sermons, almost all in Latin, covering a very wide variety of topics, as well as a commentary on Genesis and some writings against Lutheranism. As is noted in the revised Butler’s Lives of the Saints, when these writings were examined during his canonization process, it was said that “Indeed, he is fit to be included among the holy doctors of the Church.” This honor was bestowed upon him by Pope St John XXIII in 1959, the fourth centennial year of his birth, making him the 30th Doctor of the Church.

Here are a few interesting excerpts from the Apostolic letter Celsitudo ex humilitate, promulgated by Pope St John March 19th of that year, the feast of St Joseph, in which he expounds some of the reasons for making St Lawrence a Doctor. (There are very few images of St Lawrence available on the internet, and none of any real quality; if anyone cares to send in a picture of the Saint, I’d be glad to update this article and add it.)

Oh, the inestimable affection of the love of Christ, Who never has never allowed Himself to be lacking to the Church, His Bride, and finds present remedies for the evils that are hurled against her. When the insane daring of the innovators rose up, and the Catholic name was attacked by hostile assaults, when the Faith was languishing in many places among the Christian people, and morals were in steep decline, He raised up Lawrence to defend what was under attack, to avenge what had been destroyed, and to promote that which was conducive to the salvation of all. And since wicked plagues are again being introduced, and men are being ensnared by the inventions of false beliefs and other corruptions, it is useful that this many be placed in a brighter light, so that the Christian faithful may be confirmed towards what is right by the glory of his virtues, and nourished by the precepts of his salutary teaching. Therefore, just as Rome boasts of Lawrence, Christ’s unconquered champion, who by the most dire torments which he suffered, increased the strength of the Church as She was rent by persecution, so Brindisi is held in honor for begetting another Lawrence, who strengthened Her by his zeal for religion and the abundance of his talents as she was afflicted by evil from within and from without. …

In this noble and excellent two things are especially outstanding: his apostolic zeal, and his mastery of doctrine. He taught with his word, he instructed with his pen, he fought with both. Not deeming it enough to withdraw into himself, and dedicate himself to prayer and study in the refuge of his monastery, and occupy himself only with domestic matters, he leaped forth as if he could not contain the force of his spirit, wounded with the love of Christ and his brothers. Speaking from many pulpits about Christian dogma, about morals, the divine writings, and the virtues of the denizens of heaven, he spurred Catholics on to devotion, and moved those who had been swallowed up by the filth of their sins to wash away their crimes, and undertake the emendation of their lives. … outside the sacred precincts, when preaching to those who those who lacked the true religion, he defended it wisely and fearlessly; in meetings with Jews and heretics, he stood as the standard-bearer of the Roman church, and persuaded many to renounce and foreswear the opinions of false teaching. …

In the three volumes called “A Sketch of Lutheranism” (Lutheranismi hypotyposis), this defender of the Catholic law, mighty in his great learning, seeks to disabuse the people of the errors which the heretical teachers had spread. Therefore, those who treat of the sacred disciples, and especially those who seek to expound and defend the catholic faith, have in him the means to nourish their minds, to instruct themselves for the defense and persuasion of the truth, and to prepare themselves to work for the salvation of others. If they follow this author who eradicate errors, who made clear what was obscure or doubtful, they may know they walk upon a sure path. (Pope St John continues, in the traditional manner of such documents, with a lengthy list of the praises other Popes before him have heaped upon St Lawrence.)

Fifth Centenary of the Birth of St Philip Neri

$
0
0
Just a brief notice that today, July 21, 2015, is the 500th anniversary of the birth of St Philip Neri. Although St Philip spent most of his life in Rome, moving there when he was 18, and there founded the Congregation of the Oratory, he was actually a Florentine. His lifelong attachment to and friendship with the Dominicans was formed in the city of his birth, at their church of San Marco, (which is likely to close soon.) Our best wishes and prayers to all of the Oratorian houses and their members throughout the world on this auspicious day!

“ST PHILIP NERI, rapt unto God, in the Host sees Jesus Christ bless those who are in prayer.”

A New Black Vestment Set

$
0
0
An old friend, Fr Joseph Langan of the Archdiocese of Baltimore, sent us these photos of a new set of black vestments which he commissioned from the famous Gammarelli firm in Rome. The floral decoration is of a type called “lampas” in English, “lampasso” in Italian, in which flowers or other kinds of decorative element are sewn in bright material on a darker background. (See an example below.) The use of this floral motif on a Requiem vestment makes for a highly appropriate expression of the Christian understanding of death as something which ultimately leads to rebirth and reflourishing, as we say in the Requiem preface “For life is changed for Thy faithful, o Lord, not taken away.”




A 14th-century Italian lampasso with birds and flowers. (image from Italian wikipedia)

The Feast of St Mary Magdalene 2015

$
0
0

From the Grandes Heures d’Anne de Bretagne (The Great Hours of Anne of Brittany), made by Jean Bourdichon, 1503-8, for Anne, Duchess of Brittany and Queen of France (1477-1514), and considered to be one of the finest illuminated Books of Hour ever made. These two leaves come from the part of a book of Hours known as the Suffrages, a series of commemorations of the Saints, each consisting of an antiphon from that Saint’s Office, a versicle and respond, and the prayer. Here we see St Mary Magdalene before she meets the risen Christ on Easter morning, with tears on her face, holding the jar of ointments which she has brought to anoint His body; in the background, the other two Marys are shown in a similar attitude. Particularly striking is the representation of the earliest moments of sunrise behind the city of Jerusalem on the left, while the stars are still seen in the night sky above.

Antiphona: María ergo unxit pedes Jesu, et extersit capillis suis, et domus impléta est ex odóre unguenti. - Therefore Mary anointed Jesus’ feet, and wiped them with her hair, and the house was filled with the scent of the ointment.

V. Dimissa sunt ei peccáta multa - Many sins are forgiven her.
R. Quoniam dilexit multum. - Because she hath loved much.

Oratio: Largíre nobis, clementíssime Pater: ut, sicut beáta María Magdaléna, Dóminum nostrum Jesum Christum super omnia diligendo, suórum obtínuit veniam peccatórum; ita nobis apud misericordiam tuam sempiternam ímpetret beatitúdinem. Per eundem Christum, Dóminum nostrum. Amen. - Grant to us, most clement Father, that just as the blessed Mary Magdalene, by loving our Lord Jesus Christ above all things, obtained the forgiveness of her sins; so may she obtain blessedness for us before Thy everlasting mercy. Through the same Christ, our Lord. Amen. (This prayer of St Mary Magdalene is not that of the use of Rome, but was very common elsewhere; it is said in the Uses of the Premonstratensians, Dominicans, and Carmelites.)

The Great Hours of Anne of Brittany can be seen in full on the website of the Bibliothèque National de France. In addition to the liturgical texts and the very large number of sacred illustrations of the highest quality, they are also remarkable for the decorative borders; these show a great variety of plants and flowers, and small animals of every kind, all labelled in Latin, and painted with a really impressive degree of realism.

“We Sing of God Alone and for God Alone, Through the Traditional Liturgy.” - An Interview with Henri de Villiers

$
0
0
Those who plan on participating in the Populus Summorum Pontificum pilgrimage to Rome this year, from October 22-25, will not only be able to attend the traditional liturgy in St Peter’s Basilica and some other very beautiful churches. They will also hear that liturgy sung by one of the finest sacred choirs in the world, the Schola Sainte Cécile, formed by parishioners of Saint-Eugène in Paris, where the traditional liturgy has been the order of the day since 1985 alongside the modern liturgy, and directed by our own Henri Adam de Villiers. In this interview, which is also being published on the website Paix Liturgique in French, Henri presents the rich musical program which the Schola will sing at the various liturgies of the pilgrimage this year. We are very grateful to Mr Guillaume Ferluc, one of the most active organizers of the pilgrimage, for sharing the interview with us and providing this translation.
1) Good morning, Henri! For the second time since 2013, the Schola Sainte Cécile comes to Rome with the Summorum Pontificum pilgrimage. What explains this loyalty?

HAV: It is an honor, and at the same time a great joy, for us to come back to Rome with the Summorum Pontificum pilgrimage. It’s an honor because this international pilgrimage gathers many faithful from the four corners of the world who are coming to give thanks to God at the See of Peter. By participating in this pilgrimage, the faithful are coming to show how the traditional liturgy is a path of conversion and nourishment for their lives as Christians. That means that we have to give the best of ourselves to make the offices and the Masses even more beautiful and magnificent, more “extraordinary” than they ordinarily are the rest of the year!

It is also a great joy because singing in the chief places of our Catholic faith is, quite frankly, deeply moving. I remember being on the verge of tears two years ago in the Vatican Basilica: that’s how intense the feeling was, singing the holy Mass near St. Peter’s tomb.

2) Would you tell us the program you are going to present during the pilgrimage?

HAV: Gregorian chant will have pride of place, and of course it will be sung in toto at each of the Masses where we’ll be singing, as is our usual practice.

As for the polyphonic offerings, the program is unusual. We intend to take advantage of the several tribunes available in Roman churches to present works involving several choirs (as we had done two years ago) according to a technique called “cori spezzati,” i.e. “broken choirs”: the choristers take their places in several different tribunes and answer each other, sometimes quite dynamically, which produces stunning acoustical effects. This use of “cori spezzati” flourished in Rome from the Renaissance to the end of the eighteenth century. That is how we shall sing Vespers and Benediction at Trinità dei Pellegrini, with three choirs, this 22 October.

But it is especially during the Pontifical Mass on Friday October 23 that we will deploy this multiple-choir repertoire, taking advantage of the exceptional acoustics and numerous tribunes of the church of Santa Maria in Campitelli. That is where we will sing Antoine Charpentier’s Mass for 4 choirs (H.4), one of his masterpieces. It is rarely performed because of its difficulty: 16 real voices and instruments! There some indications that Charpentier may have composed this Mass while at Rome in his youth, for “Roman bargemen” (!). He unquestionably discovered this polychoral repertoire in the Eternal City: his manuscripts contain a copy of another four-choir Mass by a Roman composer, Francesco Beretta, who was the Vatican choirmaster and whom Charpentier would have met during his years of training in Rome.

To accompany this four-choir Mass by Charpentier, we will also sing three two-choir motets:

* Beati estis, with the text of the eighth beatitude, by Peter Philips, an English priest who was exiled to Rome in the seventeenth century because of this fidelity to the Catholic faith (he was the choirmaster of the English College in Rome.)
* Vox Domini by Eustache du Caurroy, choirmaster of French King Henry IV [reigned 1589-1610] and fervent promoter of multiple-choir polyphony in France.
* Omnes gentes plaudite manibus by Guillaume Bouzignac (this will probably be the first time this eight-voice piece is performed since the seventeenth century).

The acoustics at St. Peter’s of Rome, where we’ll have the joy of singing the Mass of Saint Raphael Archangel on 24 October, are more difficult, to be sure. Nevertheless, we will sing Angeli Archangeli, a great two-choir motet by Jean Veillor, choirmaster of Louis XIV during the latter’s minority, and the splendid Pange Lingua by Michel-Richard de Lalande, another of Louis XIV’s royal choirmasters. This year we will be accompanied by two sackbuts, the Renaissance and Baroque ancestor of the trombone.

3) The Schola is a choir made up of laymen, whose productions hold their own among professional choirs. What is the secret of your harmony?
HAV: Why, there’s no mystery to it, really: we sing of God alone and for God alone, through the traditional liturgy. Now this liturgy is demanding: one cannot just do whatever, and personal subjectivity must take a back seat, because one must above all follow the path of a centuries-old tradition of sacred music. The traditional liturgy is demanding, but that also means that it is a true school in excellence that draws us upwards and makes us give the best of ourselves. That is why this liturgy has begotten so many artistic wonders throughout history, not only in the realm of music, but also in the other arts, notably architecture. Rome is particularly well served in these wonders. I believe that our choristers—who are only simple parishioners—are very sensitive to that aspect: their generous personal investment is an enthusiastic response that aims to measure up to the traditional liturgy’s inherent beauty. God is the Sovereign Good and the Sovereign Beautiful—and the liturgy is a foretaste of His glory, an epiphany, Heaven on earth! So mediocrity can’t be allowed!

My work as director at the Schola Saint Cécile has above all consisted in schooling myself in the great tradition of western sacred music, which itself can only be fully grasped by a good knowledge of the liturgical and musical tradition of the Christian East. We have the joy of performing works from the great repertory of western sacred music in the exact setting for which they were created, whereas most often they are only heard at concerts. When they are ordered to their true end, which is to glorify God, these works fully take on their whole meaning, whereas they are tragically cut off from their true dimension when they are heard in any setting but the liturgy. We bring back to life marvelous forgotten works that are otherwise sleeping in the public library stacks, and we regularly stage original liturgical projects, such as singing the Mozarabic rite in Toledo or the Ambrosian rite in Milan. This can only motivate our choristers!

Lastly, I believe that making music together forms deep personal bonds. And singing for the Lord adds an extra dimension, a dimension of spiritual communion: we share a whole lot more than musical notes!

Henri Adam de Villiers
Schola Sainte Cécile
http://www.schola-sainte-cecile.com

Iconoclasm in New York City

$
0
0
One of the many lovely churches in the city of New York, The Church of Our Savior, had a number of beautiful icons ornamenting the sanctuary, placed there by a previous pastor, Father George Rutler, who had them commissioned by Ken Woo, a New York artist, between 2004-2010.
In August of 2013, Father Robert Robbins became the pastor of Our Savior. One year later, many of the icons were removed, and the previously ornamented walls whitewashed in an effort to restore the “original vision” (various sources) of the parish. While it is certainly within the rights of a pastor to renovate his church building, these changes were done quietly, without much explanation to those in the parish. (An earlier phase of this project was covered by an article in First Things last December.)

In a post on July 22 on the Parish’s facebook page, Fr. Robbins said that these changes were being made in an effort to restore the parish to the original construction design of the church. To date, 23 of the 30 icons have been removed, with the large Christ Pantocrator still behind the altar. According to multiple sources, the Pantocrator icon is slated for removal as well, only 10 years after being put in. When originally installed, it was not an innovation, but a replacement for a crumbling acrylic mural on canvas from the 1950s. The icons, therefore, were an improvement from the state of the sanctuary in 2005 before they were added.

However, it may be noted that there have been no plans to move the freestanding altar to its original location in the church for exclusively ad orientem worship. It is also worth noting that the artist was not consulted in the process of these renovations.

The parish responded to our inquiries without comment. We submitted a written inquiry for information about the project to the Archdiocese of New York, but thus far have had no reply. When and if we do hear from them, we will update this post with any appropriate information.

The pictures below show the progression of the removal of icons.

A picture of the church before changes

August 24, 2014


Evening of of July 21, 2015


July 22, 2015

Viewing all 8583 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images