Quantcast
Channel: New Liturgical Movement
Viewing all 8581 articles
Browse latest View live

Photos from the Sacra Liturgia Summer School

$
0
0
The website of the Monastery of St Benedict in the Diocese of Fréjus-Toulon has a number of great photographs from the Sacra Liturgia Summer School held there from July 5-20 of this year. His Grace Archbishop Thomas Gullickson, Apostolic Nuncio to Ukraine, was a guest lecturer and celebrant of some of the liturgies; you can read his account of the event by clicking here. There are also links within that page to his various lectures. During the summer school, the Divine Office was sung daily in the monastic rite, as well as the Holy Mass. The participants went in pilgrimage to visit the relics of St Mary Magdalen at St Maximin la Sainte-Baume, to the chapel of Notre Dame de Miremer, to the Abbey of Le Thoronet and to the relics of St Roseline of Villeneuve. On Friday July 18th, His Excellency Dominique Rey, Bishop of Fréjus-Toulon, celebrated a Pontifical Mass at the throne, assisted by local clergy and participants in the summer school. At a dinner following the Mass Bishop Rey expressed the hope that the summer school will become a regular feature of the monastery's apostolate.

In November, the proceedings of the 2013 Sacra Liturgia conference will be officially presented in Rome; we will announce the details when they become available. You can check for further initiatives from Sacra Liturgia by clicking here.

Pontifical Vespers of Sunday celebrated by Archbishop Gullickson

Solemn Mass of Our Lady at the Chapel of N.D. de Miremer
Solemn Votive Mass of St Mary Magdalene at St Maximin la Saint-Baume 
Pontifical Mass celebrated by Bishop Rey

The Feast of St Michael and All Angels

$
0
0
We say that there are nine Orders of Angels, for, by the witness of the holy Word, we know that there are Angels, Archangels, Virtues, Powers, Principalities, Dominations, Thrones, Cherubim, and Seraphim. For nearly every page of the holy Word bears witness that there are Angels and Archangels. The books of the Prophets, as is well known, often speak of the Cherubim and Seraphim. Paul the Apostle, writing to the Ephesians, (1, 21), enumerates the names of four Orders, saying “above every Principality, and Power, and Virtue, and Domination”. And again, writing to the Colossians, (1, 16), he says, “Whether they be Thrones, or Powers, or Dominations, or Principalities”. When, therefore, the Thrones are added to the four Orders of which he spoke to the Ephesians, there are five Orders; and when the Angels and the Archangels, the Cherubim and the Seraphim are added to them, there are found to be beyond all doubt nine Orders of Angels. But one must know that the word ‘Angel’ is the name of an office, not of a nature. For those holy spirits of the.heavenly fatherland are always spirits, but in no wise can they always be called Angels; for then alone are they Angels, when something is announced by them. Whence also it is said by the Psalmist (103, 4) “Who maketh spirits his messangers!” as if it were to say more clearly, “Who, when He willeth, maketh His messengers even those spirits that He hath always with Him.” - Saint Gregory the Great, Homily 34 on the Gospels

The Nine Choirs of Angels; Greek icon, late 18th-century  

Classics of the Liturgical Movement - A New Series on NLM

$
0
0
Just over a year ago on this blog, I published an article, “Carrying Forward the Noble Work of the Liturgical Movement,” praising the noble intentions of the members of the original Liturgical Movement and how these intentions were distorted and betrayed in the radicalized phase that increasingly dominated the fifties and sixties. At the time, I realized that many of the best authors on the sacred liturgy—either men from that original period or their later disciples and emulators—are not sufficiently well known among Catholics today, and that we ought to do something more to spread awareness of those authors who are the most integrally Catholic and the most insightful, and who, consequently, still have a lot to teach us today.

Accordingly, I have decided to start a new series here, introducing readers to older and newer authors who have a valid claim to be considered representatives of that authentic Liturgical Movement to which this blog has been contributing for years, and of which Pope Benedict XVI is the greatest living exponent. My plan is nothing fancy or detailed: an occasional post on a given author, with a few quotations from his writings. If people like what they read, they can purchase a new or used copy from the usual sellers out there, and add further thoughts in the combox, If they dislike what they read, again, the combox is ready to hand!

I cannot hope to mention, let alone quote from, every classic book worth reading on the Sacrifice of the Mass or the Holy Eucharist or the Liturgy taken generally—this goes far beyond my own knowledge of the territory and far beyond my own library. What I can do, however, is bring to the attention of NLM readers some particularly fine writing from the old and new Liturgical Movements to help ensure that work of great merit will be remembered (or, as the case may be, rediscovered) and valued today as it deserves to be valued, and also that work published more recently does not fall into oblivion now that we may be entering a wintry and more difficult phase of our work.

Let me be clear up front about what this series will NOT be.  I won’t be giving a biography of the authors, or an overview of their life’s work, or entering into questions of possible controversial views they may have had (particularly since almost every author in the Liturgical Movement had some occasionally odd ideas that either fortunately perished without issue or unfortunately got translated into the postconciliar reforms). In that sense, my inclusion of a book or author MUST NOT be construed as an endorsement of everything he argues in that book or any other work. (One thinks of Romano Guardini in this connection—a magnificent theologian in so many books or passages of his books, but quite out to lunch, if not to Mars, in others.)

What is my positive goal? Simply to share with readers a taste of the riches that can be found in these authors and to encourage a re-reading of them. They have so much to offer us in wisdom, insight, guidance, encouragement, the reappropriation of the great sources, the deepening of the spiritual life. It seems to me that we are, in fact, in an ideal position to re-read them, because we have seen fifty years of experimentation, novelty, scandal, and abuse in the liturgical realm, we have witnessed what happens when strange theories are translated into practice, and so we will not be as tempted as the original readers of these authors to wander astray when we hit their peculiar pet ideas.  We are more likely to resonate with the profound truths for the dissemination of which the Lord, in His Providence, raised up these men, who were animated by a most profound love for and devotion to the sacred liturgy.

Like most series at NLM, this one will appear at indeterminate intervals, when and as I have occasion to prepare posts that pertain to it. I am also very open to suggestions from readers—particularly if they will send me excerpts of writings they would like to see included in a post!

We will commence next week with a rather obscure item, Canon G. A. Simon’s Commentary for Benedictine Oblates on the Rule of Saint Benedict (1947), which exemplifies the kind of rich spiritual doctrine that was once commonplace in Catholic writing—and which, happily, is back in print for the edification of Catholics today.

A Priest Explains to His Parish Why He Has Commissioned Art and What Made Him Choose Traditional Styles

$
0
0
In his Letter to Artists in 1999, Saint Pope John Paul II asked for a dialogue between artists and the church in order help initiate and direct the creation of a 'new epiphany of beauty'. This dialogue can take place at various levels. At one end of the spectrum a Pope can call the world's most successful creative artists to Rome and hold a high profile symposium. However, if we really are going to see a change in the culture it has take place right down at the level of the ordinary parish. Only when priest, artist, congregation and the patron (or whoever pays for it) are working together in commissioning works of art that are in harmony with our worship will we start to see effects rippling out into the wider culture.

Here is and example of how part of that might take place. Fr Charles Byrd of Our Lady of the Mountains has been instrumental in commissioning art and musical compositions for the liturgy. I was involved in discussions for the commissioning of some art work and from the artists point of view it was very good. A genuine conversation in which both participated in working out what could be created to fulfill the aims he stated for the work. As he does so he writes about them in the parish newsletter also keeping the parish informed. Here is a great article posted on the parish website and entitled Icons and Iconoclasm. It explains the place of sacred images in the Western tradition, why there are different forms, why some are valid and some are not; and it describes the tensions that lead to iconoclasm at various periods in the Church's history, including the recent past. 
It seems to me that he has a reason, beyond simply giving good information about art to his parish. Father is explaining why he thinks that it is important that their community is commissioning art and why the choices of style they have made are in accord with tradition. I think that he gives a very good and persuasive account - one that I learnt much from when I read it. It describes well how we balance respect for traditional forms with innovation, so that where it is appropriate we can timeless truths in ways that will heard by people today. 
Here is the article: 
These days, we’re likely to associate the word “icon” with symbols on our computer screen, but in the Church, “icon” is the word for an image of religious art that the Church uses in teaching the Faith and in encouraging religious piety.  In the 1500 years of Church history before the invention of the printing press, images were important, because few had books and fewer still were literate.  When missionaries went into pagan lands, they took with them icons of Our Lord and of Our Lady to help them overcome the initial language barrier and to introduce another heathen race to the Gospel.  Sometimes, these original images became beloved by the people, as they could hardly imagine Our Lord or Our Lady looking anything other than like those initial holy pictures depicted them to be.  So culturally, some images become very important to certain ethnic groups.
Sacred art can teach us about the mysteries of the Bible and the importance of the saints.  And, let’s face it, just because a person can read doesn’t mean that he or she will.  Sometimes an image can encourage such a person to want to know more.

So, sacred art is also a focus for our contemplation and prayer.  Praying before an image of the Lord allows us to look upon the face of our beloved, and contemplate the face we long to see in heaven.  Icons can help us lose ourselves in a prayer without words.  By looking upon the face of the Lord, or of Our Lady, or of the saints, we can ponder the mystery of salvation history and of the Church, and become inspired to live more virtuous lives, to live prayerful lives, and to invoke the example and the prayers of the Church triumphant.

Catholic art developed over a span of twenty centuries and took some divergent paths, depending upon historical circumstances of the day.  The earliest images we have of the Apostles are in the catacombs of Rome, where the paintings show the apostles in togas and looking like Romans.  In time, however, our image of the apostles changed.  Catholic artists blazed new trails in more vigorous ages, but also looked back to keep in mind the precedents, too.  Thus, a baroque chapel in Rome might have, at its gilded center, a darkened icon said to be painted by St. Luke himself.  And each age and people have their own gifts.  So, for example, the Greeks became famous for their mosaics, the Celts for their books, the Anglo-Saxons for their ecclesial textiles, the Italians for their frescos, and the French for stained glass.  There is much variety over the ages, but there are two large trunks that we should look at more closely when it comes to the topic of sacred art – the divergent trunks of the east and the west.

In the eastern branches of Christianity, monks became responsible for the painting of icons, copying exactly from an ancient precedent in the time-honored way (just as they would copy scripture without changing a single word).  So, in eastern tradition, iconography is very much a fixed style within a fixed technique.  Their tradition is one that encourages the artist to lose himself in the art, to learn from his masters, and not to deviate.  In such an atmosphere, one might come to believe that too much novelty is approaching heresy.

Some of the icons in our own parish have a decidedly eastern quality to them, painted on boards with egg-tempera.  These icons might look a bit unnatural or stylized to us, and their colors somewhat muted.  Some of these were commissioned from eastern iconographers, others brought back from the east.  These are masterworks of iconographers, each a work of art.  Though they followed strict precedents, the artists sometimes introduced elements that were western, bridging the two traditions.  For instance, our icon of St. John the Baptist is eastern, but contains a quote from a modern western priest.

In the western Church, our artistic tradition developed such that we tended to let the layman (not the monk) take up the task of religious art, and those artists took some bold steps away from the byzantine or eastern precedents.  Consequently, in the west, our art can look less stylized and more natural and life-like.  This method led to some magnificent masterpieces (just visit Italy), but these lay artists sometimes took too many liberties.  Their art looked less and less devotional and more of a personal expression.  This led, in some cases, to a kind of decadence or barbarism.

As a general rule, the more deeply an artist practices the Faith, the less likely it is that his/her art will be offensive to the faithful.  But finding faithful artists who understand good Catholic art has become more and more difficult in the west, when art schools today encourage abstraction in their art.  As Catholics, we want beautiful art, not ironic, or blasphemous, or unintelligible art.  We don’t want artistes sneering at us for wanting beautiful art.  Sadly, to make up for the lack of vision or talent in our less enlightened age, many churches have turned to reproductions of old art, and while the people are less offended by these attractive reproductions, we certainly aren’t helping artists in our day.

Given the decadence of the visual arts in the west, to turn eastward seems a logical step.  The eastern tradition of iconography makes it almost impossible for the pride and decadence of the west to occur, because in the east, they are very much tied to a set and strict canon of images they produce again and again without deviation.  Within the western tradition of religious art, it is trickier to balance our more liberal sense of style, because it can become more and more subjective.  So while in the east, the art might seem to some to be stilted or stuck in one epoch, in the west, our art can become ridiculously tied to the trends of our day.

In our parish church, there are many examples of western art, too.  Our parochial art is, for the most part, historically modern, but not necessarily “modern” in style (aka silly or abstract).  Taken as a whole, the art in our parish church reflects a conscious effort to blend east and west, ancient and modern, byzantine and gothic, Asian and European, Anglo and Latino, and even the amateur and the professional.  So, for example, we commissioned eastern iconographers to create new icons of western saints in gothic frames, or asked an artist to create a new retablo in an updated Spanish colonial style, or brought in a primitive bas-relief woodcarving from South America and put it nearby an antique icon brought back from Palestine.  This eclectic blend of styles and influences is purposeful and strategic.  By so doing, we hope that the results are both reflective of whom we are as modern American Catholics made up of a people from all over the world, but also something genuinely refreshing (both spiritually and aesthetically).

We see our efforts to patronize the arts as exemplary in the broader recovery of a sense of the sacred, and we take our leadership in the advancement of the arts seriously.  Our parish art takes us backwards so that we can move forward again.  By looking back, we can become less absurdly modern (in the pejorative sense of the word).  If we mean by “modern” that we are without faith, that we have lost all belief in objective beauty, and that the only good art is abstract and ugly, then we must repudiate that sense of “modern” as loathsome and inimical to our Faith and even to our very essence.

But there is nothing wrong with being “modern” if we mean “alive now,” if we mean created in our own age, or in a fresh or updated style.  Almost all the art in our parish was created for our parish in our day and age.  Still, we need those ancient precedents and masterpieces to help us learn who we are.  Through them, we can find and recover our own tradition that has been broken and needs restoring.  Let’s face it, at times our tradition has been almost obliterated by lesser minds following the trends of the day.

If icons are holy images, then we should also say something about iconoclasm, which is the destruction of sacred images and the rejection of representational art as idolatrous.  Iconoclasm was a heresy that began in the east in the eighth and ninth century.  Islam had burst forth with a fury from the deserts of Arabia and it had made its way north into the great homelands of the Church, and with Islam came a spirit of destruction that influenced Christians in the east to begin to suspect their own tradition of iconography.  If there had been some Catholics who saw the veneration of icons in the east as occasionally excessive, there were also heretics (including bishops) who began to see all matter as evil, so the veneration of icons, relics, or even the sacraments was considered evil, in as much as one was venerating a material thing.

The emperors in Constantinople, influenced by so many heretical opinions, wanted to “purify” the Church and therefore, declared all icons to be idols.  Thus began the persecution of anyone who honored or kept holy pictures, and the systematic destruction of these images.  The monasteries, where the ancient icons were kept and the new icons made, and where the old faith was zealously guarded and lived out, became targets for the emperors’ ruthless attacks and persecutions.  Monks were tortured and put to death, monasteries destroyed, and efforts were made to abolish monasticism in the east.  Sacred relics were thrown into the sea to be lost forever.  (Many Greek monks fled to the west at this time and found protection and patronage under the popes.  As a result, Rome has some beautiful mosaics from this period.)

The center of the heresy was Constantinople.  The iconoclastic emperors wanted to gain more control of the Church for the purposes of centralizing power in the government, so the emperors expanded the authority of Constantinople’s archbishops.  The power of Constantinople became more and more unchecked in the campaign against holy pictures.

The people finally began to riot in the streets as their cultural patrimony was being so senselessly desecrated and destroyed.  Over time, some eastern bishops appealed to a succession of popes in Rome.  But the emperors in the east had long ago stopped thinking of the popes as having any authority over them.  To the contrary, the tyrannical eastern emperors presumed to order the western popes to destroy the images in Rome, even threatening to come to Rome and break the beloved bronze statue of St. Peter in the Vatican and imprison the pope.  Several popes in Rome had first tried to ignore the heretical emperors, and then tried to correct the heretics in Byzantium, but these emperors could send fleets to harass the pope, and steal papal lands.  Sadly, these many years of the iconoclastic heresy in the east set up the eastern schism that would occur a few generations later.

But the heresy probably helped to codify in the east their present canon of ancient icons as prototypes, because after iconoclasm ended, the churches in the east had to reproduce holy images, and it was understandable that a certain set of icons would thereafter become their norm (whereas in the west, where artistic development was more fluid and uninterrupted, we have a less established sense of religious imagery).

In the west, some iconoclasm did occur within the Frankish Church, but the real iconoclasm came with the Protestant rebellion, which was (like the iconoclasm of the east) anti-monastic, anti-papal, exceedingly destructive of culture, and hysterically opposed to the veneration of icons, of relics of the saints, and even the invocation of the saints.  The devastating level of loss of heritage and art at the time of this so-called “reformation” is impossible to measure.  When Christians turn like a mob of Barbarians upon our own culture, who is left to stop us?

While these irrational attacks on art were done in the name of “reason,” it was also an attempt (like earlier in Byzantium) to empower the crown at the expense of the universal authority of the pope and to enrich the state’s coffers to the impoverishment of the monasteries.  When Englishmen were forced to become Protestants and the patrimony of the English Church destroyed, Catholic Europe, if anything, became even more visual, as if for every monastery that was wrecked and for every piece of art that was destroyed in the Protestant north, the Catholic south had to build ever more sumptuous churches and fill them with even more art.  So while the Baroque churches dripping with sumptuous art are not everyone’s favorite, no one could call them puritanical!

Thus, Catholics remained more or less a people who loved art, until the 20thcentury when a rupture of sorts occurred.  History will look at the period of time after the Second Vatican Council as a highly iconoclastic age in many parts of the west, when art was destroyed at a level unseen since the rise of Protestantism.  This 20th century iconoclastic barbarism was in no way called for by the Church nor by the Council, but no reasonable observer of the Church who lived through the second half of the twentieth century would deny that the wanton destruction of stained glass, of altars, of statues, and of holy images was endemic (even epidemic!) to the spirit of the age.

The scandalous stories are heartbreaking, when priests commanded their own parishioners to destroy stained glass windows with sledgehammers, when monasteries and seminaries whitewashed over frescoes, and dropped marble altars and statues into lakes, when parishioners secretly followed their own pastors out to the trash bins to recover discarded statues or vestments or holy vessels.  It is hard to imagine.  The ugly modern aesthetic of “the abstract” sadly had its destructive influence on our western minds, and for a while it seemed that if anything looked traditional or beautiful, it had to be rejected and replaced by the novel, the bizarre, or the unintelligible.  But this was not just an artistic style at play; it was a conscious effort to remove the sacred from our worship.  Moreover, there was also an accompanying loss of respect for the priesthood, the sacraments, nuns and brothers, sisters and monks, monasteries and convents.

Happily, much of the contemporary “art” of that era had a short shelf life, and soon became an embarrassment.  Today, in many places, younger Catholics strive to pick up the pieces and remake their parishes anew in the Church’s tradition, but how do they address this cultural loss?  Do they just put everything Victorian back in place, or do they advance their culture in new ways?  While Our Lady of the Mountains parish never went through that iconoclasm, we were nevertheless born in that age, and so we too need to find a new Catholic American aesthetic that speaks to us about our history, our culture, and that promotes our Catholic piety.


This makes our efforts at OLM all the more important in that we are endeavoring to live out a more authentic and more orthodox expression of our great Catholic Faith.  As Catholics, we do not worship wood or stone, but we do love beautiful art, and we use the arts to teach the Faith.  Moreover, as Catholics, we must be guardians over the patrimony of our heritage and of our ancient tradition.  Our parish is a place where the arts are celebrated and encouraged, where icons and relics have been re-introduced into our daily piety.  Here beautiful stained glass windows and statues are to be a part of our parish experience.  As such, we reaffirm our Catholic culture, but we also hope to advance it.

News from the ICKSP in England

$
0
0
We reported last week that the shrine of St. Walburge in Preston, England, in the Diocese of Lancaster, was to celebrate this past Saturday the inaugural Mass of its new life as a shrine dedicated to Eucharistic Adoration, under the care of the Institute of Christ the King. A reader has posted a number of photographs of the Mass on flickr; you can see the full set by clicking here.



About a year and a half ago, we posted a video on the Institute’s other English Apostolate, at the church of Ss Peter, Paul and Philomena in Wirral, England, in the Diocese of Shrewbury. The landmark building was nicknamed the “Dome of Home” during the Second World War, since it could be seen far out at sea and became a useful landmark for navigating back to England. The author of the original video, Mr Philip Chidell, has now expanded and updated it; it includes some interview footage with His Excellency Mark Davies, the Bishop of Shrewbury.

The Feast of Saint Thérèse of Lisieux (OF)

$
0
0
I confess to thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them to the little ones. V. O Lord, my hope from my youth. (Gradual for the Mass of St. Thérèse)

A photograph of St Thérèse taken in 1896
Confitebor tibi Pater, Domine caeli et terrae, quia abscondisti haec a sapientibus et prudentibus, et revelasti ea parvulis. V. Domine, spes mea a juventute mea.

The Feast of the Guardian Angels

$
0
0
In all their affliction he was not troubled, * and the Angel of his presence saved them. V. In his love, and in his mercy he redeemed them, and he carried them and lifted them up all the days of old. And the Angel of his presence saved them. Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit. And the Angel of his presence saved them. (the 6th responsory of Matins

The Guardian Angels, from the Almugávar Hours, ca. 1510-20, now in the Walters Art Museum in Baltimore
R. In omni tribulatione eorum non est tribulatus, * et Angelus faciei ejus salvavit eos: V. In dilectione sua et in indulgentia sua ipse redemit eos, et portavit eos, et elevavit eos cunctis diebus sæculi. Et Angelus. Gloria Patri. Et Angelus.

A New Book on Cardinal Dante, with Great Pictures of Papal Ceremonies

$
0
0
I am very happy to be able to share with our readers news of the publication of a new e-book about Enrico Cardinal Dante, just released by Mr. Bartłomiej Krzych, a seminarian with the Community of St Gregory the Great; the book is available for free consultation and download here: http://enricodante.blogspot.com/p/czytaj-online.html. The bulk of the original text is in Polish, but it also contains a number of documents in Latin and Italian, such as the diploma by which Msgr. Dante was appointed to the College of Pontifical Ceremonieres by Pope St Pius X in 1914, and that by which he was made the Prefect of Pontifical Ceremonies in 1947 under Pius XII. By permission of the current Master of Ceremonies, Msgr Guido Marini, and under the copyright of the Office for Pontifical Celebrations, Mr Krzych was also able to include in the book a good number of unique and interesting photographs, including several of Msgr. Dante’s episcopal consecration in the Lateran Basilica at the hands of St John XXIII, on September 21, 1962. There are also over thirty photos of the episcopal consecration of Gabriel Coussa, which was celebrated by Pope John in the Byzantine Rite in the Sistine Chapel on April 16, 1961, Good Shepherd Sunday of that year in the Roman Rite. (Bishop Coussa was shortly thereafter appointed Pro-Secretary of the Congregation for the Oriental Churches; the following year he was made a Cardinal, and Secretary of the same Congregation, but died only four months later.) The book also contains a complete reproduction of the booklet of the Liturgy of St John Chrysostom used at this ceremony, with the Greek original on one side and a Latin translation on the facing pages. Our deepest thanks to Mr. Krzych for his research, and for letting us know about this publication.

Monsignor Dante (far left) at his episcopal consecration, with Pope St John XXIII
The high altar of St John in the Lateran.
Pope St John XXIII celebrating the episcopal consecration of Bishop Gabriel Coussa. The photographs make it clear that, unlike the normal Papal Mass in the Roman Rite, the Pope wears the tiara throughout the ceremony, as the equivalent of the crown normally used by bishops in the Byzantine Rite. He is also wearing a sakkos, the normal vestment of a Byzantine bishop when celebrating the Divine Liturgy, but with the phanon and pallium over it.
A wide view of the Sistine Chapel as it was set up for this ceremony. Even in black-and-white, one can see the sorry condition of the Last Judgment of Michangelo, and of the paintings on the side walls by Perugino and Botticelli, before the great restoration done between 1984 and 1999.
 

The Cherubic Hymn, and the prayer which is said while it is sung. The Greek rubric says that the prayer is said by the archpriest and the priest, while the Latin says it is said “by the Supreme Pontiff and the concelebrants”. This would seem to indicate that the Pope said his parts of the Divine Liturgy in Latin.

Upcoming Events : 40 Hours in New York, A Suspicious Concert in Philadelphia, Requiem in Latrobe

$
0
0
The weekend of October 17-19 will be busy with interesting events. In New York City, the Dominican Church of St Catherine of Siena will hold a Forty-Hours Devotion. The preacher this year is Fr. Gabriel O’Donnell, O.P., who in addition to being a renowned preacher and spiritual director, is the postulator of the causes for canonization of Mother Mary Alphonsus (Rose Hawthorne) and the Venerable Fr. Michael J. McGivney, founder of the Knights of Columbus. The weekend’s devotions will include ample time for Eucharistic Adoration, Masses, Confessions, and the music of St. Catherine’s professional choir, Schola Dominicana. Full details are available in the flyer below.


On Friday October 17th, at 8 p.m., the Suspicious Cheese Lords will offer a special concert at the Cathedral Basilica of Ss Peter and Paul in Philadelphia. The Cheese Lords (see explanation hereand here) are a sacred music ensemble specializing in the works of lesser-known composers; the concert is described as follows on their website:

The Suspicious Cheese Lords present a program of unaccompanied Renaissance works, focusing on an exquisite but little-known repertoire, such as an anonymous setting of the Salve Regina from a 17th-century Guatemalan choirbook. The bulk of their program will consist of “FrankenMass,” a complete Mass setting which they’ve crafted from five different bodies (of work), and sutured together with the threads of their parodied melodies. Come hear the Cheese Lords dig up a war song, a love song, a Gregorian chant, and a polyphonic motet from the Renaissance and reanimate them into…FrankenMass!

On Saturday, October 18, at 10:30 a.m., St Vincent Archabbey in Latrobe Pennsylvania will celebrate a Requiem High Mass for Br. Nathan Cochran, O.S.B., who passed away on July 30, 2014. Br. Nathan was a monk of the Archabbey, where he taught art and music at the college, and served as curator and director for over 20 years at The Saint Vincent Gallery. He is most known for his works as the Canadian and U.S.A. Delegate for the Kaiser-Karl-Gebetsliga für den Völkerfreiden, (Emperor Karl League of Prayers for Peace Among the Nations). He worked at Vatican City as the special secretary for the Beatification of Emperor Karl I of Austria. He received the Signum Memoriae Civilian Medal of Honor from H.I.R.H. Otto von Habsburg, Archduke and Crown Prince of Austria and King of Hungary; it was the first time the medal had been bestowed since 1898, and was presented in honor of Archduke Otto’s 95th birthday. Full details are available in the flyer below.

An Interview with Dom Alcuin Reid in Regina Magazine

$
0
0
Regina Magazine has just published an interview with Dom Alcuin Reid about his scholarly work in liturgy, and his assessment of the current condition of the Church’s liturgical life. Here are a few excerpts; you can click over to their website to read the full interview.

Regarding the “reform of the reform” – wanting to align the Novus Ordo Mass more with the actual intention of Vatican II—where would you describe this process as being at?

Officially it would seem that consideration of this is stalled. But then, only a few years before Summorum pontificum in 2007 no-one could have foreseen its appearance, so who knows what could come from the Holy See in the future? At the grass roots level, however, many clergy are now putting into practice a manner of celebrating the reformed rites that is in more tangible continuity with liturgical tradition and with the intentions of the Council, which intended a moderate liturgical reform, not a ritual revolution!

What are the most positive things you see regarding the state of liturgical reform in the Church today?

The widespread realisation by practically all now that the liturgical life of the Western Church following the Council was not without serious defects is a very positive development. There are sharply differing responses to this “question of the liturgy” of course, but the fact that people are prepared to discuss and consider it is an important step forward.

So too is the growing appreciation of the essential role of beauty in the liturgy. We owe much of this to the example and teaching of Benedict XVI, certainly, pre-eminently in his 2007 Apostolic Exhortation Sacramentum caritatis, where he writes so beautifully of the ars celebrandi, “the fruit of faithful adherence to the liturgical norms in all their richness.” More and more clergy and others responsible for preparing liturgical celebrations are taking his teaching to heart and implementing it, which can do nothing but good.

And indeed Pope Benedict’s authoritative establishment that the usus antiquior– the older form of the Roman rite – may freely be celebrated by those who wish it enables its treasures to live and breathe in the Church of the 21st century. The number of young people who are attracted to this, and the vocations the usus antiquior inspires, are truly signs of the times. ...

If there is one thing should we keep in mind when considering the liturgy, what is it?

Cardinal Ratzinger put this beautifully in his preface to The Organic Development of the Liturgy: “If the liturgy appears first of all as the workshop for our activity, then what is essential is being forgotten: God. For the liturgy is not about us, but about God. Forgetting about God is the most imminent danger of our age. As against this, the liturgy should be setting up a sign of God’s presence. Yet what happens if the habit of forgetting about God makes itself at home in the liturgy itself and if in the liturgy we are thinking only of ourselves? In any and every liturgical reform, and every liturgical celebration, the primacy of God should be kept in view first and foremost.”

Ss Francis of Assisi and Catherine of Siena, Patron Saints of Italy

$
0
0
When an American pilgrim visits the ancient cities of Italy today, he may easily fail to realize that his own country is older than the modern state of Italy by nearly a century. From the fall of the Roman Empire until the mid-19th century, the Italian peninsula was divided into many countries, of varying size and importance, and the Pope himself ruled a fairly large one, with Rome as its capital. This country, variously called the Papal State or States of the Church, was the last to be conquered, in 1870, by the north Italian kingdom of Savoy, the consummation of the movement known as the “Risorgimento.” Perhaps even less well known today are the fiercely anticlerical character of the Savoyard government, and the long state of cold war that existed between it and the Church after the fall of the Papal State. For nearly 60 years, in fact, neither would officially recognize the other, and for much of that period, Catholics were forbidden under pain of excommunication from participating in the public life of Italy.

This unhappy situation was ended by the Lateran Pacts of 1929, whereby the Church formally recognized the Kingdom of Italy, which in turn recognized the sovereignty of the Pope over a tiny fraction of his former domains, the modern State of Vatican City. It was not however Pius XI, the Pope then reigning, who gave to modern Italy Saints Francis of Assisi and Catherine of Siena as her Patron Saints, but rather his successor, Pius XII; this year has already marked the 75th anniversary of the Pope’s decree to that effect, issued less than 3 months before the war that came after the War to End All Wars. Prescient perhaps of the new catastrophe awaiting the peoples of Europe, including the Italians, Pope Pius writes of his choices:
Francis, poor and humble, truly the image of Jesus Christ, gave unlimited examples of the life of the Gospel to the very turbulent men of his age, and by establishing his three orders, opened to them a swift way towards the correction of morals both private and public, and to the true sense of the Catholic faith. In the same way did the most vigorous and devout virgin Catherine effectively work to encourage and establish harmony between the cities and towns of her land … (Licet commissa nobis, June 18, 1939.)
Via the blog Cantuale Antonianum, I discovered this video of Pope Pius’ visit to the church of Santa Maria sopra Minerva, where the body of St Catherine rests under the high altar, shortly after the proclamation of the new Patron Saints. It is very much in the style of its times, and sadly rather blurry, but documents a truly moving display of popular devotion. In the second half, we hear the music of the Capella Sistina, directed by Lorenzo Perosi, (again, very much in the style of its times), followed by the voice of the Pope himself, as he calls Saint Catherine “Mother of her people, Angel of Peace,” and prays that she and Francis will protect Italy and lead her to God.

I have long thought that the choice of Francis and Catherine as joint Patrons of Italy was a particularly inspired one on the part of Pius XII, not only for their individual importance as Saints, but also as representatives of two religious orders whose impact on the fortunes of nearly every Italian city can hardly be overstated. A great part of the history of the Renaissance in particular is the history of the Franciscans and Dominicans, and of their patrons and parishioners, commissioning art works for their innumerable churches. Today, the Renaissance is too frequently spoken of as it were solely a Florentine affair, and the vital role of the Franciscans within it too easily forgotten. Much of the inspiration for the art of that period comes from St Francis and his love of creation, not for its own sake, but inasmuch as he saw every part of it as an expression of God’s love and mercy.

It was this that lead Franciscans scientists and others associated with the Order, (Robert Grosseteste and Roger Bacon are the most famous examples), to investigate how light, the beginning of creation, enables us to see and know the rest of it; and this in turn lead to the rediscovery of perspective in painting. Likewise, St Francis’ love for and interest in the created order also inspired the search for a more realistic depiction of it, leading Italian painting away from the hieratic styles of the low Middle Ages. It is not a coincidence that so much of the great Italian art of the 14th and 15th centuries is found in churches built by Franciscans, from the Basilica of St Francis in Assisi to the Sistine Chapel in Rome. Nor is it mere chance that one of the greatest Italian painters of all time, Fra Angelico, was a Dominican friar.

Of the innumerable images of St Francis in the basilica in Assisi, surely one of the most beautiful is the so-called Sunset Madonna, by Pietro Lorenzetti. This is a fresco on a west-facing wall in the left transept of the lower church; it is called “the Sunset Madonna” because there is a window directly opposite it, through which the rays of the setting sun illuminate it for about an hour at the end of each day. The fresco was painted around 1320 above an altar (now removed) dedicated to St John the Evangelist, who is seen on the right side. One of the donors is depicted beneath him, in prayer before a Crucifix, and his wife was probably in the part on the left side now missing; the donor may very well have been named John, which was also St Francis’ baptismal name.


The traditional story about the arrangement of the remaining figures is that the Christ Child is asking his Mother, “Which of My Saints loves Me the most?”, to which the Madonna answers by pointing at St Francis, as if to say “He does.”

TLM for Feast of Our Lady of the Rosary - Harvard Catholic Center

Classics of the Liturgical Movement: Canon Simon's Commentary on the Rule

$
0
0
Canon G. A. Simon was a priest oblate of St. Wandrille Abbey. That's as much information as one can readily find about him. I have never seen a photo of him. But his magnificent commentary on the Rule of St. Benedictcontains countless passages of rich spiritual wisdom that retains all of its clarity, penetration, and relevance for those who are striving to learn the imitation of Christ from St. Benedict and his monastic legacy. In particular, Canon Simon has much to say about liturgical spirituality and the opus Dei, and in this regard embodies the finest flowering of the early (and healthy) liturgical movement that owed so much to the reestablishment of traditional monastic life in the 19th century.

If you are one of those who admire and try to follow the Benedictine teaching on the centrality of the devout worship of God in the sacred liturgy, I definitely recommend Canon Simon's commentary. Here are some choice passages.

*          *          *
Commentary for Benedictine Oblates on the Rule of Saint Benedict (1947)

pages 162-63:
          There are methods of spirituality which may present a certain danger.  They are those which make of personal perfect — ‘self-improvement’ as Father Faber called it, without approving of it — the first goal of our effort.  Man considers himself first.  His asceticism has the end of reforming him, modeling him, completing him, as an artist does with a statue which he would make a masterpiece.  And in practice God finds Himself relegated to the background.  Asceticism, says Father Faber, is then no more than ‘a systematizing and a glorifying of self-will.’  Regret for sin is nothing more than ‘the bitterness of endless piecemeal failure,’ and perhaps, if the sin has had witnesses, the pique at having let others get an impression other than that which one wished to give them.  Thus the method ends in pride.
          St. Benedict, on the contrary, invites us to look at God.  He wants us to seek God truly: si vere Deum quaerit.  He wants us to follow in Christ’s footsteps, pergamus itinera Christi, and to have our eyes wide open to the ‘deifying light.’  The gaze fixed on God, whom we know to be present, is at the first step of humility and at the base of perfection.  It is because this God who sees us detests sin that we avoid committing it.  It is to make room for God that we renounce our own will.  Obedience is nothing but a complete docility to all the divine desires.  It is for God, to be more united to the Crucified, that we accept humiliation and suffering.  It is for Him that we renounce ourselves.  If our sins trouble us, it is not because they ‘mar the symmetry of our character,’ but because they grieve the Holy Spirit.  Thus is the soul quieted and confident, even in the face of its faults.  And because it is looking on the supreme Beauty, it forgets itself, it immolates itself and it mounts in Love.  It understands that its whole existence should be like a divine praise.  It expands in joy: the joy of knowing its God, the joy of loving Him, the joy of possessing Him already and of counting on the eternal possession of Him.
          The more we study the Holy Rule the more we understand that for St. Benedict life is nothing but a ‘search for God,’ an ardent and joyous search, thanks to which we reach that end from which egoism had turned us away and which is none other than perfect love.

pp. 301-2:
          St. Benedict wants the monk’s whole life to be permeated with the thought of God, and he wants everything in that life to minister to sanctification and progress in charity. . . . There is nothing in the truly Christian life, then, that escapes the supernatural spirit. It is not a life partitioned, in which more or less large rooms are reserved for God. Everything is for God. The daily toil, whatever be its nature, becomes matter for humility, matter for sacrifices, matter for imitation of the Lord Jesus; it becomes a holy thing, it becomes prayer. And in this sense it is true to say: He who works, prays.
          For the sanctification of toil St. Benedict demands a direction of intention. We must offer the toil to God beforehand and ask him to come to our aid.

pg. 323
          St. Benedict teaches us also equanimity and even joy in forced abstinence. Here as elsewhere he forbids absolutely any sadness, ill humor, murmuring. It so often happens that we have not the courage to impose mortifications on ourself. At least we ought to give the Lord a good reception when He Himself chooses for us the matter of our penances. “If a limited or absolute privation should be the case,” says Dom Étienne, “it ought to be considered as a divine permission and to excite in faithful souls a feeling of thanksgiving instead of complaints and murmuring. And not only in this circumstance, but every time it pleases God to impose a privation. That is the meaning of the conclusion of this chapter: ‘Before everything, we desire that murmuring be banished.’”

pp. 338-39:
          Prayer, and liturgical prayer above all, is the source of all interior life and the soul of every apostolate.
          “No ministry, no labors, however fruitful or necessary they be in themselves, will ever replace the preponderance of prayer, the preferential esteem to which it has a right. Let that ministry, that work, that toil infringe on the time reserved before all for the Work of God, and once more will the word of Scripture be realized: ‘You have sowed much and reaped little’ (Aggaeus 1:6); for the Lord will not fail to exercise His right of reprisal. . . . And is it not here that we must look for the principal cause of the meager results sometimes obtained by manifold and sustained efforts, by labors which naturally speaking ought to have produced much more?” (L’Huillier).
          If we want our action to be truly fruitful, therefore, we must give the [Divine] Office the preponderant place in our life. It is through liturgical prayer that the life in God will be maintained in our souls; it is thence that we shall draw the strength and the light necessary in order to attract souls to us and to direct them. Without this basis there is only human activity, that is to say, almost nothing.
          Love of the opus Dei implies regularity in the manner of performing it. Since prayer is what gives our life its orientation and its whole meaning, since it is what should be most dear to us and what is most necessary for us, let us apply ourselves to it as often as our schedule calls for it.

pp. 364-65:
          St. Benedict . . . knows no particular method of prayer. It is quite simply the fruit of the liturgy and of the sacred readings. Our morning prayer, therefore, will feed at once on our readings and on the liturgical prayer we have just completed. Hymns, Psalms, lessons, mysteries, lives of the Saints, orations—we shall find there an inexhaustible source of reflection and contemplation. The Psalms in particular adapt themselves in a surprising way to the liturgical cycle and to our states of soul.
          The mind which has contemplated the mysteries, followed Jesus Christ, Our Lady, and the Saints, found its own needs in the petitions the Church addresses to God, makes a selection as if by instinct in the memories of those readings. All those things enlighten one another mutually. And while we pray and meditate, we are continuing to pray with the Church, to sing with her, to contemplate with her. The Church is our guide and our mistress. And the thoughts and resolutions she herself has prompted and inspired will be found as if brought to life again every time we take up our breviary during the day.
          Prayer is not a little exercise apart, separated from the rest of our life by a sort of partition. On the contrary, it maintains a close contact with the Office and the lectio divina. And thus is realized in the interior life a unity more fruitful than the dispersion in which too many souls live, poorly enlightened on the close connection which ought to make a single whole of the Office, spiritual reading, and prayer.

Photos of a 4th Century Glass Plate With Image of Christ Discovered in Spain

$
0
0
From the BBC website, here are some photos of a plate believed to have been used for the consecration of the host. The articles describes the figure as wearing a philosopher's toga and beardless (the latter was common in early images as far as I am aware). What strikes me is the beauty of glasswork. The two figures are, we told, believed to be Peter and Paul.



a reconstruction of the image is below...

Photopost: Society for Catholic Liturgy Conference in Colorado Springs

$
0
0
The Society for Catholic Liturgy has just concluded one of its best-attended conferences, which was held Oct. 2-4 at St. Mary’s Cathedral in downtown Colorado Springs.
The SCL’s next conference in October 2015 will be held in New York. More information is forthcoming. 
To follow updates from the Society, follow their Facebook page or Twitter account.
Also, Carl Bunderson of the Catholic News Agency has published an article highlighting events at the conference, and summarizing the keynote address of Bishop James Conley (Lincoln).
Colorado Springs, Colo., Oct 7, 2014 / 12:24 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Evangelization will be carried out by bringing beauty to Catholic culture and liturgy, Bishop James Conley of Lincoln told a group of scholars and pastors gathered for an interdisciplinary conference.

“The work you’re doing is essential to the formation of Christian culture. The Church needs you … the work of evangelization is too important,” he said Oct. 2 at the 2014 conference of The Society for Catholic Liturgy, held at St. Mary's Cathedral in Colorado Springs.

“The ugliness of secularism demands that we proclaim the 'via pulchritudinis' [way of beauty] in the cathedrals and chapels and parish churches across the country,” he said.

The Oct. 2-4 conference included the celebration of Mass, in both the ordinary and extraordinary forms, and of Vespers with Bishop Conley and with Bishop Michael Sheridan of Colorado Springs. It was among the best-attended annual conferences The Society for Catholic Liturgy has held, according to one of the group's board members.

Bishop Conley delivered the keynote address at the conference. He called The Society for Catholic Liturgy “a true sign of hope” for the renewal of liturgy.

The bishop noted that the lead-up to the Synod for Families, being held in Rome Oct. 5-19, has been “strange,” noting the discouragement brought on by some “to discard basic components of sacramental theology because of the difficulties they represent” and said he has “been baffled” by some bishops' conferences which “seem to have equivocated on doctrinal issues: cohabitation, contraception, and divorce in the face of increased secularization.”

“It seems that in some of the corners of the Church, the universal call to holiness – to greatness and to virtue – is being drowned out by a tide of mediocrity and secularism.”

It is in this context of secularization that the importance of beauty and liturgy is so essential to evangelization, Bishop Conley continued.

“Beautiful liturgy glorifies God, and awakens a natural human desire for beauty. Music and art and architecture draw men to the transcendent, and to the mystery of the beautiful Trinity.”
Read the rest on the CNA's website.

A view from the “Garden of the Gods” in beautiful Colorado Springs (click photo for larger view)
President of the Society for Catholic Liturgy, Dr. Michael Foley (Baylor) introduces Bishop Conley
Bishop Conley (Lincoln) Keynote Address
Bishop Conley (Lincoln) Keynote Address
Friday evening vespers with Bishop Sheridan (Colorado Springs)
SCL Board Member, Fr. Uwe Michael Lang (London Oratory) gives a homily at Friday's Mass in the Extraordinary Form
Dr. Michael Foley (president, SCL) and Dino Marcantonio (vice president/treasurer, SCL) serve at Friday's Mass in the Extraordinary Form

SCL Member Duncan Stroik gives a plenary address during Friday's banquet

Fr John Saward to Speak in NYC this Saturday

$
0
0
A reminder that this year’s Art of the Beautiful series opens this Saturday, October 11th at the Catholic Center at NYU. Rev. John Saward (Oxford University) will discuss The Poverty of the Church and the Beauty of the Liturgy. 
Fr John will consider the answer to the following question: “Is there a place for liturgical beauty in what Pope Francis has called ‘the Church that is poor and for the poor’?” . As usual for these events there will be sung Compline afterwards.He is the author of a number of great books on beauty, culture and art and perhaps most well known is the Holiness of Beauty and the Beauty of Holiness (which has to be one of the best book titles ever).

Other speakers in an impressive line-up of future talks are my colleague Dr Ryan Topping of Thomas More College of Liberal Arts, Thomas Hibbs of Baylor University, Julia Yost of Yale University; Fr Bruno Shah of the University of Virginia and the final speaker in March is Bishop James D Conley from Lincoln, NE.

Talks take place at the Catholic Center at NYU, Thompson Street in Manhattan. Their website, for further information, is www.catholicartistssociety.org/

EF Confirmations in Queens, NYC

$
0
0
This past Sunday, October 5, His Excellency Nicholas DiMarzio, Bishop of Brooklyn, conferred the Sacrament of Confirmation on 23 young people from the TLM Community that worships in the chapel of St. John’s Cemetery in Queens, New York (Diocese of Brooklyn). Fr. Joseph Wilson offered the regularly scheduled Missa cantata, which takes place at the chapel every Sunday at 9 a.m., followed by the Confirmations. Mr Arrys Ortanez has posted over 100 photos of the event, which you can see by clicking here; our thanks to him for sharing them with us, and to His Excellency for his support of the young people of his diocese who attend the traditional Mass. Ad multos annos!





Solemn Mass for the Feast of Blessed John Henry Newman in DC

$
0
0
Solemn Mass for the Feast of Blessed John Henry Newman of The Oratory

St Thomas Apostle Catholic Church, Woodley Road, NW, Washington DC

Thursday October 9th at 7.30pm

Celebrant : The Very Rev Msgr Andrew Wadsworth (Moderator)

Homilist : The Rev Fr Richard Mullins (Pastor)

The music will include the Chant Propers, Mass VIII, and Newman's hymns Firmly I believe and Praise to the holiest.

Link Between Solomon’s Temple & Catholic Churches - Society for Catholic Liturgy Conference Part 2

$
0
0
Carl Bunderson has published another excellent article, summarizing a number of sessions at the recently-concluded conference of the Society for Catholic Liturgy in Colorado Springs, which was held from October 2-4. 
To follow this and other news of the Society for Catholic Liturgy, subscribe to their Facebook page, or follow them on Twitter, Google+, or LinkedIn.

The Society's next conference will be in New York in October, 2015.
By Carl Bunderson
Colorado Springs, Colo., Oct 8, 2014 / 12:43 am (CNA/EWTN News).- A conference held last week in Colorado Springs by The Society for Catholic Liturgy brought together experts from multiple disciplines to discuss the continuity between the Jewish temple, and Catholic churches and liturgy.

Dr. Michael P. Foley, associate professor of patristics at Baylor University, is president of The Society for Catholic Liturgy. He told CNA at the closing of the Oct. 2-4 conference that the speakers “did a marvelous job connecting the dots” regarding its theme of “how the Christian church really is this fulfilment of the great Temple of Solomon.”

“The society as a whole, I've always thought of as an enormously important organization because of the kinds of conversation that it generates. We get a really good interdisciplinary approach to things; there is a lot of talent that assembles – experts in art, architecture, music, and theology – and it's rare to get all those people in the same room … so it's nice to see the synergies that come together.”

Foley added that the conferences of the Society for Catholic Liturgy, which publishes the journal Antiphon, are notable for their inclusion of both scholarly and pastoral presentations: “We don't want to be just some ivory tower, castle-in-the-air kind of organization, especially where the liturgy is concerned, because the liturgy … is about worship, which is active and practical. For it really to be a liturgical organization, we need to have both a scholarly and a pastoral side; I am pleased we have both those tracks.”

The Oct. 2-4 conference, hosted by the Cathedral of St. Mary, included the celebration of Mass in both the ordinary and extraordinary forms, and of Vespers with Bishop Conley and with Bishop Michael Sheridan of Colorado Springs. It was among the best-attended annual conferences The Society for Catholic Liturgy has held, according to one of the group's board members.

The event began with Vespers and a keynote address by Bishop Conley, who called The Society for Catholic Liturgy “a true sign of hope” for the renewal of liturgy.

His keynote focused on the thesis that evangelization will be carried out by bringing beauty to Catholic culture and worship: “The ugliness of secularism demands that we proclaim the 'via pulchritudinis' [way of beauty] in the cathedrals and chapels and parish churches across the country,” he said.

Bishop Conley asked those present to “imagine the transformation of our Church – of culture, in fact – if beautiful liturgy awakened Catholic souls to wonder, to conversion. Imagine the consequences of beautiful liturgy awakening souls to Jesus Christ.”

He then offered three principles essential to promoting beauty in Catholic worship: gratitude, charity, and steadfast commitment.

Additional plenary addresses at the conference were given by Dr. Denis McNamara, an architect who spoke about how rediscovering the meaning of the Temple informs the design of Catholic churches; Duncan Stroik, also an architect, who spoke on renaissance-era churches as the fulfilment of Jewish Temple architecture; and Fr. Uwe Michael Lang, C.O., on the concept of sacrifice seen in St. Augustine's City of God and its link to the Eucharist.

NAC Diaconal Ordinations in St Peter's Basilica

$
0
0
Each year, the Pontifical North American College in Rome holds diaconal ordinations in the Basilica of St Peter at the beginning of October. It is always a particularly festive occasion, since many of the families take the opportunity to make a pilgrimage to the Eternal City, so they can are present for their son’s ordinations. This year, they were joined by a number of American prelates who are in Rome for the Synod on the Family. The ceremony was held on the morning of Thursday, October 2, and forty-three men were ordained by His Eminence Donald Cardinal Wuerl, Archbishop of Washington, D.C. The NAC, as it is colloquially known, has a huge flickr account with over 260 albums of photos, and has posted a whole series of albums dedicated to the ordination, and the events of the days leading up to it, with well over a thousand photos. These are all the works of men who are currently studying in Rome and living at the College; among the photographs of the ordination ceremony itself, there are also several nice ones of the interior of St Peter’s. Our congratulations to the newly ordained deacons; please remember to pray for them as they complete the studies that will lead them to priestly ordination at the end of this school year. (All photographs in this article are reproduced here by kind permission of the PNAC Photo Service; no. 1, 6 and 7 by Kyle Mangloña, no. 2 by Bill Van Wagner, no. 3, 4, 8 and 9 by Michael Lund, no. 5 and 10 by Daniel Hart.)

Prayer vigil with the families of the ordinandi at Sant’ Andrea della Valle 
A vigil held in the college itself the night before the Ordinations
Dalmatics ready. (full photoset set here.) 
 

The Gospel of the Mass (full photoset of the Mass here.)
The Prostration at the Litany of the Saints
 




Viewing all 8581 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images